Literature DB >> 20121306

Effects of semantic context and feedback on perceptual learning of speech processed through an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.

Jeremy L Loebach1, David B Pisoni, Mario A Svirsky.   

Abstract

The effect of feedback and materials on perceptual learning was examined in listeners with normal hearing who were exposed to cochlear implant simulations. Generalization was most robust when feedback paired the spectrally degraded sentences with their written transcriptions, promoting mapping between the degraded signal and its acoustic-phonetic representation. Transfer-appropriate processing theory suggests that such feedback was most successful because the original learning conditions were reinstated at testing: Performance was facilitated when both training and testing contained degraded stimuli. In addition, the effect of semantic context on generalization was assessed by training listeners on meaningful or anomalous sentences. Training with anomalous sentences was as effective as that with meaningful sentences, suggesting that listeners were encouraged to use acoustic-phonetic information to identify speech than to make predictions from semantic context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20121306      PMCID: PMC2818425          DOI: 10.1037/a0017609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  26 in total

1.  Ecological aspects of auditory rehabilitation.

Authors:  E Borg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 2.  Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding.

Authors:  Robert S Lockhart
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov

3.  Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rose A Burkholder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-05

4.  Relations among linguistic and cognitive skills and spoken word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Collison; Benjamin Munson; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perception of "Elliptical Speech" Following Cochlear Implantation: Use of Broad Phonetic Categories in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Rebecca Herman; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2003

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Reception of environmental sounds through cochlear implants.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.

Authors:  D K Eddington; W H Dobelle; D E Brackmann; M G Mladejovsky; J L Parkin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Short-term auditory memory in children using cochlear implants and its relevance to receptive language.

Authors:  P W Dawson; P A Busby; C M McKay; G M Clark
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  15 in total

1.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss; Cecilia Kirk; Gregory A O'Beirne; Tim Anderson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Familiarization Effects on Consonant Intelligibility in Dysarthric Speech.

Authors:  Heejin Kim
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 0.849

4.  Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Adaptive plasticity in speech perception: Effects of external information and internal predictions.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Auditory Learning Using a Portable Real-Time Vocoder: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Friederike Schlaghecken; James Harte; Katherine L Roberts
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.