Literature DB >> 16316287

Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework.

Sven L Mattys1, Laurence White, James F Melhorn.   

Abstract

A central question in psycholinguistic research is how listeners isolate words from connected speech despite the paucity of clear word-boundary cues in the signal. A large body of empirical evidence indicates that word segmentation is promoted by both lexical (knowledge-derived) and sublexical (signal-derived) cues. However, an account of how these cues operate in combination or in conflict is lacking. The present study fills this gap by assessing speech segmentation when cues are systematically pitted against each other. The results demonstrate that listeners do not assign the same power to all segmentation cues; rather, cues are hierarchically integrated, with descending weights allocated to lexical, segmental, and prosodic cues. Lower level cues drive segmentation when the interpretive conditions are altered by a lack of contextual and lexical information or by white noise. Taken together, the results call for an integrated, hierarchical, and signal-contingent approach to speech segmentation. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16316287     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  67 in total

1.  Phonological Priming in Children with Hearing Loss: Effect of Speech Mode, Fidelity, and Lexical Status.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Nancy Tye-Murray; Markus F Damian; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The use of fundamental frequency for lexical segmentation in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Stephanie Spitzer; Julie Liss; Tony Spahr; Michael Dorman; Kaitlin Lansford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of allophonic cues to English word boundaries by Japanese second language learners of English.

Authors:  Kikuyo Ito; Winifred Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss; Cecilia Kirk; Gregory A O'Beirne; Tim Anderson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  Sing that tune: infants' perception of melody and lyrics and the facilitation of phonetic recognition in songs.

Authors:  Gina C Lebedeva; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 8.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Perception of dialect variation in noise: intelligibility and classification.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Anne Cutler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.