Literature DB >> 24002435

Voxel-based statistical analysis of uncertainties associated with deformable image registration.

Shunshan Li1, Carri Glide-Hurst, Mei Lu, Jinkoo Kim, Ning Wen, Jeffrey N Adams, James Gordon, Indrin J Chetty, Hualiang Zhong.   

Abstract

Deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms have inherent uncertainties in their displacement vector fields (DVFs).The purpose of this study is to develop an optimal metric to estimate DIR uncertainties. Six computational phantoms have been developed from the CT images of lung cancer patients using a finite element method (FEM). The FEM generated DVFs were used as a standard for registrations performed on each of these phantoms. A mechanics-based metric, unbalanced energy (UE), was developed to evaluate these registration DVFs. The potential correlation between UE and DIR errors was explored using multivariate analysis, and the results were validated by landmark approach and compared with two other error metrics: DVF inverse consistency (IC) and image intensity difference (ID). Landmark-based validation was performed using the POPI-model. The results show that the Pearson correlation coefficient between UE and DIR error is rUE-error = 0.50. This is higher than rIC-error = 0.29 for IC and DIR error and rID-error = 0.37 for ID and DIR error. The Pearson correlation coefficient between UE and the product of the DIR displacements and errors is rUE-error × DVF = 0.62 for the six patients and rUE-error × DVF = 0.73 for the POPI-model data. It has been demonstrated that UE has a strong correlation with DIR errors, and the UE metric outperforms the IC and ID metrics in estimating DIR uncertainties. The quantified UE metric can be a useful tool for adaptive treatment strategies, including probability-based adaptive treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002435      PMCID: PMC4068011          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/18/6481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

1.  Consistent image registration.

Authors:  G E Christensen; H J Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  Julia A Schnabel; Christine Tanner; Andy D Castellano-Smith; Andreas Degenhard; Martin O Leach; D Rodney Hose; Derek L G Hill; David J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations.

Authors:  Weiguo Lu; Ming-Li Chen; Gustavo H Olivera; Kenneth J Ruchala; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A method to estimate the effect of deformable image registration uncertainties on daily dose mapping.

Authors:  Martin J Murphy; Francisco J Salguero; Jeffrey V Siebers; David Staub; Constantin Vaman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Jinkoo Kim; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets.

Authors:  Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Rudy Guerra; Valen E Johnson; Travis McPhail; Amit K Garg; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS).

Authors:  Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.

Authors:  J J Gordon; N Sayah; E Weiss; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  The utilization of consistency metrics for error analysis in deformable image registration.

Authors:  Edward T Bender; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Development of a deformable lung phantom for the evaluation of deformable registration.

Authors:  Jina Chang; Tae-Suk Suh; Dong-Soo Lee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  10 in total

1.  A hybrid biomechanical intensity based deformable image registration of lung 4DCT.

Authors:  Navid Samavati; Michael Velec; Kristy Brock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A Novel Respiratory Motion Perturbation Model Adaptable to Patient Breathing Irregularities.

Authors:  Amy Yuan; Jie Wei; Carl P Gaebler; Hailiang Huang; Devin Olek; Guang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  An adaptive MR-CT registration method for MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Ning Wen; James J Gordon; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis.

Authors:  Ziad Saleh; Maria Thor; Aditya P Apte; Gregory Sharp; Xiaoli Tang; Harini Veeraraghavan; Ludvig Muren; Joseph Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Effect of deformable registration uncertainty on lung SBRT dose accumulation.

Authors:  Navid Samavati; Michael Velec; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Tagged MRI based cardiac motion modeling and toxicity evaluation in breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ting Chen; Meral Reyhan; Ning Yue; Dimitris N Metaxas; Bruce G Haffty; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Learning anatomy changes from patient populations to create artificial CT images for voxel-level validation of deformable image registration.

Authors:  Z Henry Yu; Rajat Kudchadker; Lei Dong; Yongbin Zhang; Laurence E Court; Firas Mourtada; Adam Yock; Susan L Tucker; Jinzhong Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Validation of accuracy deformable image registration contour propagation using a benchmark virtual HN phantom dataset.

Authors:  Robert Boyd; Amar Basavatia; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Percy Lee; Adam D Yock; Jeffrey R Olsen; Minsong Cao; Farzan Siddiqui; William Parker; Anthony Doemer; Yi Rong; Amar U Kishan; Stanley H Benedict; X Allen Li; Beth A Erickson; Jason W Sohn; Ying Xiao; Evan Wuthrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy - how should we evaluate and interpret the result?

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jean Pouliot; Eric Smith; Cynthia Chuang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.