Literature DB >> 25775937

An adaptive MR-CT registration method for MRI-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Hualiang Zhong1, Ning Wen, James J Gordon, Mohamed A Elshaikh, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J Chetty.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance images (MRI) have superior soft tissue contrast compared with CT images. Therefore, MRI might be a better imaging modality to differentiate the prostate from surrounding normal organs. Methods to accurately register MRI to simulation CT images are essential, as we transition the use of MRI into the routine clinic setting. In this study, we present a finite element method (FEM) to improve the performance of a commercially available, B-spline-based registration algorithm in the prostate region. Specifically, prostate contours were delineated independently on ten MRI and CT images using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Each pair of MRI and CT images was registered with the B-spline-based algorithm implemented in the VelocityAI system. A bounding box that contains the prostate volume in the CT image was selected and partitioned into a tetrahedral mesh. An adaptive finite element method was then developed to adjust the displacement vector fields (DVFs) of the B-spline-based registrations within the box. The B-spline and FEM-based registrations were evaluated based on the variations of prostate volume and tumor centroid, the unbalanced energy of the generated DVFs, and the clarity of the reconstructed anatomical structures. The results showed that the volumes of the prostate contours warped with the B-spline-based DVFs changed 10.2% on average, relative to the volumes of the prostate contours on the original MR images. This discrepancy was reduced to 1.5% for the FEM-based DVFs. The average unbalanced energy was 2.65 and 0.38 mJ cm(-3), and the prostate centroid deviation was 0.37 and 0.28 cm, for the B-spline and FEM-based registrations, respectively. Different from the B-spline-warped MR images, the FEM-warped MR images have clear boundaries between prostates and bladders, and their internal prostatic structures are consistent with those of the original MR images. In summary, the developed adaptive FEM method preserves the prostate volume during the transformation between the MR and CT images and improves the accuracy of the B-spline registrations in the prostate region. The approach will be valuable for the development of high-quality MRI-guided radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25775937      PMCID: PMC4386880          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/2837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom.

Authors:  Deming Wang; Wendy Strugnell; Gary Cowin; David M Doddrell; Richard Slaughter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants.

Authors:  Alfredo Polo; Federica Cattani; Andrea Vavassori; Daniela Origgi; Gaetano Villa; Hugo Marsiglia; Massimo Bellomi; Giampiero Tosi; Ottavio De Cobelli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  John M Schallenkamp; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse; Thomas M Pisansky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A novel approach for establishing benchmark CBCT/CT deformable image registrations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jinkoo Kim; Sanath Kumar; Chang Liu; Hualiang Zhong; Deepak Pradhan; Mira Shah; Richard Cattaneo; Raphael Yechieli; Jared R Robbins; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Prostate seed implant quality assessment using MR and CT image fusion.

Authors:  R J Amdur; D Gladstone; K A Leopold; R D Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Roach; P Faillace-Akazawa; C Malfatti; J Holland; H Hricak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Interobserver delineation variation using CT versus combined CT + MRI in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Geert M Villeirs; Koen Van Vaerenbergh; Luc Vakaet; Samuel Bral; Filip Claus; Wilfried J De Neve; Koenraad L Verstraete; Gert O De Meerleer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study.

Authors:  J Lian; L Xing; S Hunjan; C Dumoulin; J Levin; A Lo; R Watkins; K Rohling; R Giaquinto; D Kim; D Spielman; B Daniel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  CT-MRI image fusion for delineation of volumes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  G L Sannazzari; R Ragona; M G Ruo Redda; F R Giglioli; G Isolato; A Guarneri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  8 in total

1.  Deformable MR-CBCT prostate registration using biomechanically constrained deep learning networks.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Impact of 18F-Fluciclovine PET on Target Volume Definition for Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiotherapy: Initial Findings from a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ashesh B Jani; Eduard Schreibmann; Peter J Rossi; Joseph Shelton; Karen Godette; Peter Nieh; Viraj A Master; Omer Kucuk; Mark Goodman; Raghuveer Halkar; Sherrie Cooper; Zhengjia Chen; David M Schuster
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Multimodal image registration for the identification of dominant intraprostatic lesion in high-precision radiotherapy treatments.

Authors:  Delia Ciardo; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Giuseppe Petralia; Giorgia Timon; Dario Zerini; Raffaella Cambria; Elena Rondi; Federica Cattani; Alessia Bazani; Rosalinda Ricotti; Maria Garioni; Davide Maestri; Giulia Marvaso; Paola Romanelli; Marco Riboldi; Guido Baroni; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Converting from CT- to MRI-only-based target definition in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer: A comparison between two modalities.

Authors:  Tiina Seppälä; Harri Visapää; Juhani Collan; Mika Kapanen; Annette Beule; Mauri Kouri; Mikko Tenhunen; Kauko Saarilahti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Radiomics based targeted radiotherapy planning (Rad-TRaP): a computational framework for prostate cancer treatment planning with MRI.

Authors:  Rakesh Shiradkar; Tarun K Podder; Ahmad Algohary; Satish Viswanath; Rodney J Ellis; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.

Authors:  An Qin; Dan Ionascu; Jian Liang; Xiao Han; Nicolette O'Connell; Di Yan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Fast contour propagation for MR-guided prostate radiotherapy using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  K A J Eppenhof; M Maspero; M H F Savenije; J C J de Boer; J R N van der Voort van Zyp; B W Raaymakers; A J E Raaijmakers; M Veta; C A T van den Berg; J P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Deforming to Best Practice: Key considerations for deformable image registration in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Barber; Johnson Yuen; Michael Jameson; Laurel Schmidt; Jonathan Sykes; Alison Gray; Nicholas Hardcastle; Callie Choong; Joel Poder; Amy Walker; Adam Yeo; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Kristie Harrison; Annette Haworth; David Thwaites
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-08-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.