Literature DB >> 20384233

Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.

Hualiang Zhong1, Jinkoo Kim, Indrin J Chetty.   

Abstract

Computer aided modeling of anatomic deformation, allowing various techniques and protocols in radiation therapy to be systematically verified and studied, has become increasingly attractive. In this study the potential issues in deformable image registration (DIR) were analyzed based on two numerical phantoms: One, a synthesized, low intensity gradient prostate image, and the other a lung patient's CT image data set. Each phantom was modeled with region-specific material parameters with its deformation solved using a finite element method. The resultant displacements were used to construct a benchmark to quantify the displacement errors of the Demons and B-Spline-based registrations. The results show that the accuracy of these registration algorithms depends on the chosen parameters, the selection of which is closely associated with the intensity gradients of the underlying images. For the Demons algorithm, both single resolution (SR) and multiresolution (MR) registrations required approximately 300 iterations to reach an accuracy of 1.4 mm mean error in the lung patient's CT image (and 0.7 mm mean error averaged in the lung only). For the low gradient prostate phantom, these algorithms (both SR and MR) required at least 1600 iterations to reduce their mean errors to 2 mm. For the B-Spline algorithms, best performance (mean errors of 1.9 mm for SR and 1.6 mm for MR, respectively) on the low gradient prostate was achieved using five grid nodes in each direction. Adding more grid nodes resulted in larger errors. For the lung patient's CT data set, the B-Spline registrations required ten grid nodes in each direction for highest accuracy (1.4 mm for SR and 1.5 mm for MR). The numbers of iterations or grid nodes required for optimal registrations depended on the intensity gradients of the underlying images. In summary, the performance of the Demons and B-Spline registrations have been quantitatively evaluated using numerical phantoms. The results show that parameter selection for optimal accuracy is closely related to the intensity gradients of the underlying images. Also, the result that the DIR algorithms produce much lower errors in heterogeneous lung regions relative to homogeneous (low intensity gradient) regions, suggests that feature-based evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy must be viewed cautiously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20384233      PMCID: PMC3188658          DOI: 10.1118/1.3302141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  34 in total

1.  Consistent image registration.

Authors:  G E Christensen; H J Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations.

Authors:  Weiguo Lu; Ming-Li Chen; Gustavo H Olivera; Kenneth J Ruchala; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A real time finite element based tissue simulation method incorporating nonlinear elastic behavior.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Mark P Wachowiak; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Technical note: A novel boundary condition using contact elements for finite element based deformable image registration.

Authors:  Tiezhi Zhang; Nigel P Orton; T Rockwell Mackie; Bhudatt R Paliwal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Anisotropic multi-scale fluid registration: evaluation in magnetic resonance breast imaging.

Authors:  W R Crum; C Tanner; D J Hawkes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration.

Authors:  K K Brock; M B Sharpe; L A Dawson; S M Kim; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Three-dimensional velocity mapping of lung motion using vessel bifurcation pattern matching.

Authors:  Mutsumi Tashiro; Shinichi Minohara; Tatsuaki Kanai; Ken Yusa; Hideyuki Sakurai; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons.

Authors:  J P Thirion
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  D Yan; F Vicini; J Wong; A Martinez
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy.

Authors:  He Wang; Lei Dong; Jennifer O'Daniel; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Deborah A Kuban; Mark Bonnen; Joe Y Chang; Rex Cheung
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  35 in total

1.  Four-dimensional dosimetry validation and study in lung radiotherapy using deformable image registration and Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  Tzung-Chi Huang; Ji-An Liang; Thomas Dilling; Tung-Hsin Wu; Geoffrey Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Characterization of deformation and physical force in uniform low contrast anatomy and its impact on accuracy of deformable image registration.

Authors:  Raj Varadhan; Taiki Magome; Susanta Hui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A novel approach for establishing benchmark CBCT/CT deformable image registrations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jinkoo Kim; Sanath Kumar; Chang Liu; Hualiang Zhong; Deepak Pradhan; Mira Shah; Richard Cattaneo; Raphael Yechieli; Jared R Robbins; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Composite Radiation Dose Representation Using Fuzzy Set Theory.

Authors:  Samuel B Park; James I Monroe; Min Yao; Mitchell Machtay; Jason W Sohn
Journal:  Inf Sci (N Y)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.795

5.  Anthropomorphic dual-lattice voxel models for optimizing image quality and dose.

Authors:  Nina Petoussi-Henss; Helmut Schlattl; Janine Becker; Matthias Greiter; Maria Zankl; Christoph Hoeschen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-30

6.  Evaluation of adaptive treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Salim M Siddiqui; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Direct dose mapping versus energy/mass transfer mapping for 4D dose accumulation: fundamental differences and dosimetric consequences.

Authors:  Haisen S Li; Hualiang Zhong; Jinkoo Kim; Carri Glide-Hurst; Misbah Gulam; Teamour S Nurushev; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Voxel-based statistical analysis of uncertainties associated with deformable image registration.

Authors:  Shunshan Li; Carri Glide-Hurst; Mei Lu; Jinkoo Kim; Ning Wen; Jeffrey N Adams; James Gordon; Indrin J Chetty; Hualiang Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Evaluation of whole-body MR to CT deformable image registration.

Authors:  A Akbarzadeh; D Gutierrez; A Baskin; M R Ay; A Ahmadian; N Riahi Alam; K O Lövblad; H Zaidi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Adaptive radiotherapy for NSCLC patients: utilizing the principle of energy conservation to evaluate dose mapping operations.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.