Literature DB >> 22320766

A method to estimate the effect of deformable image registration uncertainties on daily dose mapping.

Martin J Murphy1, Francisco J Salguero, Jeffrey V Siebers, David Staub, Constantin Vaman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a statistical sampling procedure for spatially-correlated uncertainties in deformable image registration and then use it to demonstrate their effect on daily dose mapping.
METHODS: Sequential daily CT studies are acquired to map anatomical variations prior to fractionated external beam radiotherapy. The CTs are deformably registered to the planning CT to obtain displacement vector fields (DVFs). The DVFs are used to accumulate the dose delivered each day onto the planning CT. Each DVF has spatially-correlated uncertainties associated with it. Principal components analysis (PCA) is applied to measured DVF error maps to produce decorrelated principal component modes of the errors. The modes are sampled independently and reconstructed to produce synthetic registration error maps. The synthetic error maps are convolved with dose mapped via deformable registration to model the resulting uncertainty in the dose mapping. The results are compared to the dose mapping uncertainty that would result from uncorrelated DVF errors that vary randomly from voxel to voxel.
RESULTS: The error sampling method is shown to produce synthetic DVF error maps that are statistically indistinguishable from the observed error maps. Spatially-correlated DVF uncertainties modeled by our procedure produce patterns of dose mapping error that are different from that due to randomly distributed uncertainties.
CONCLUSIONS: Deformable image registration uncertainties have complex spatial distributions. The authors have developed and tested a method to decorrelate the spatial uncertainties and make statistical samples of highly correlated error maps. The sample error maps can be used to investigate the effect of DVF uncertainties on daily dose mapping via deformable image registration. An initial demonstration of this methodology shows that dose mapping uncertainties can be sensitive to spatial patterns in the DVF uncertainties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22320766      PMCID: PMC3267790          DOI: 10.1118/1.3673772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  A method to map errors in the deformable registration of 4DCT images.

Authors:  Constantin Vaman; David Staub; Jeffrey Williamson; Martin J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A stochastic approach to estimate the uncertainty involved in B-spline image registration.

Authors:  M Hub; M L Kessler; C P Karger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS).

Authors:  Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Estimation of three-dimensional intrinsic dosimetric uncertainties resulting from using deformable image registration for dose mapping.

Authors:  Francisco J Salguero; Nahla K Saleh-Sayah; Chenyu Yan; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A distance to dose difference tool for estimating the required spatial accuracy of a displacement vector field.

Authors:  Nahla K Saleh-Sayah; Elisabeth Weiss; Francisco J Salguero; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Adapting inverse planning to patient and organ geometrical variation: algorithm and implementation.

Authors:  M Birkner; D Yan; M Alber; J Liang; F Nüsslin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Planning study comparison of real-time target tracking and four-dimensional inverse planning for managing patient respiratory motion.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Geoffrey D Hugo; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  How does CT image noise affect 3D deformable image registration for image-guided radiotherapy planning?

Authors:  Martin J Murphy; Zhouping Wei; Mirek Fatyga; Jeffrey Williamson; Mitchell Anscher; Timothy Wallace; Elizabeth Weiss
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dose mapping: validation in 4D dosimetry with measurements and application in radiotherapy follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Zhang; Tzung-Chi Huang; Ken M Forster; Kang-Ping Lin; Craig Stevens; Eleanor Harris; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Monte Carlo dose mapping on deforming anatomy.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  15 in total

1.  The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.

Authors:  Ziad H Saleh; Aditya P Apte; Gregory C Sharp; Nadezhda P Shusharina; Ya Wang; Harini Veeraraghavan; Maria Thor; Ludvig P Muren; Shyam S Rao; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  On voxel-by-voxel accumulated dose for prostate radiation therapy using deformable image registration.

Authors:  Jialu Yu; Nicholas Hardcastle; Kyoungkeun Jeong; Edward T Bender; Mark A Ritter; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-11

Review 3.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Voxel-based statistical analysis of uncertainties associated with deformable image registration.

Authors:  Shunshan Li; Carri Glide-Hurst; Mei Lu; Jinkoo Kim; Ning Wen; Jeffrey N Adams; James Gordon; Indrin J Chetty; Hualiang Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate deformable organ variations in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Huijun Xu; Douglas J Vile; Manju Sharma; J James Gordon; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Feasibility of synthetic computed tomography generated with an adversarial network for multi-sequence magnetic resonance-based brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yuhei Koike; Yuichi Akino; Iori Sumida; Hiroya Shiomi; Hirokazu Mizuno; Masashi Yagi; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yuji Seo; Osamu Suzuki; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  MIRSIG position paper: the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Lowther; Rob Louwe; Johnson Yuen; Nicholas Hardcastle; Adam Yeo; Michael Jameson
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-05-06

8.  Assessment of myocardial metabolic disorder associated with mediastinal radiotherapy for esophageal cancer -a pilot study.

Authors:  Rei Umezawa; Kentaro Takanami; Noriyuki Kadoya; Yujiro Nakajima; Masahide Saito; Hideki Ota; Haruo Matsushita; Toshiyuki Sugawara; Masaki Kubozono; Takaya Yamamoto; Yojiro Ishikawa; Ken Takeda; Yasuyuki Taki; Kei Takase; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Dose mapping sensitivity to deformable registration uncertainties in fractionated radiotherapy - applied to prostate proton treatments.

Authors:  David Tilly; Nina Tilly; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2013-06-14

10.  Comparison of User-Directed and Automatic Mapping of the Planned Isocenter to Treatment Space for Prostate IGRT.

Authors:  Zijie Xu; Ronald Chen; Andrew Wang; Andrea Kress; Mark Foskey; An Qin; Timothy Cullip; Gregg Tracton; Sha Chang; Joel Tepper; Di Yan; Edward Chaney
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.