Literature DB >> 25465391

NEMA NU 4-Optimized Reconstructions for Therapy Assessment in Cancer Research with the Inveon Small Animal PET/CT System.

Charline Lasnon1, Audrey Emmanuelle Dugue, Mélanie Briand, Cécile Blanc-Fournier, Soizic Dutoit, Marie-Hélène Louis, Nicolas Aide.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared conventional filtered back-projection (FBP), two-dimensional-ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) and maximum a posteriori (MAP) NEMA NU 4-optimized reconstructions for therapy assessment. PROCEDURES: Varying reconstruction settings were used to determine the parameters for optimal image quality with two NEMA NU 4 phantom acquisitions. Subsequently, data from two experiments in which nude rats bearing subcutaneous tumors had received a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor were reconstructed with the NEMA NU 4-optimized parameters. Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean)) variations among groups.
RESULTS: All NEMA NU 4-optimized reconstructions showed the same 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ([(18)F]FDG) kinetic patterns and detected a significant difference in SUV(mean) relative to day 0 between controls and treated groups for all time points with comparable p values.
CONCLUSION: In the framework of therapy assessment in rats bearing subcutaneous tumors, all algorithms available on the Inveon system performed equally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25465391     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-014-0805-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET.

Authors:  A Chatziioannou; J Qi; A Moore; A Annala; K Nguyen; R Leahy; S R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Molecular imaging of neuroblastoma progression in TH-MYCN transgenic mice.

Authors:  Carmelo Quarta; Erika Cantelli; Cristina Nanni; Valentina Ambrosini; Daniela D'ambrosio; Korinne Di Leo; Silvia Angelucci; Federico Zagni; Filippo Lodi; Mario Marengo; William A Weiss; Andrea Pession; Roberto Tonelli; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Scatter characterization and correction for simultaneous multiple small-animal PET imaging.

Authors:  Rameshwar Prasad; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Using the NEMA NU 4 PET image quality phantom in multipinhole small-animal SPECT.

Authors:  Anita A Harteveld; Antoi P W Meeuwis; Jonathan A Disselhorst; Cornelis H Slump; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman; Eric P Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Reproducibility study of [(18)F]FPP(RGD)2 uptake in murine models of human tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Edwin Chang; Shuangdong Liu; Gayatri Gowrishankar; Shahriar Yaghoubi; James Patrick Wedgeworth; Frederick Chin; Dietmar Berndorff; Volker Gekeler; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice.

Authors:  Barbara J Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Isabel Hildebrandt; Chris Tran; Benjamin S Halpern; David Stout; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Yuchuan Wang; Jurgen Seidel; Benjamin M W Tsui; Juan J Vaquero; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Evaluation of F-nifene binding to α4β2 nicotinic receptors in the rat brain using microPET imaging.

Authors:  Ritu Kant; Cristian C Constantinescu; Puja Parekh; Suresh K Pandey; Min-Liang Pan; Balu Easwaramoorthy; Jogeshwar Mukherjee
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Contrast-enhanced small-animal PET/CT in cancer research: strong improvement of diagnostic accuracy without significant alteration of quantitative accuracy and NEMA NU 4-2008 image quality parameters.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Elske Quak; Mélanie Briand; Zheng Gu; Marie-Hélène Louis; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  5 in total

1.  Image quality of Zr-89 PET imaging in the Siemens microPET Focus 220 preclinical scanner.

Authors:  Tyler J Bradshaw; Martin J Voorbach; David R Reuter; Anthony M Giamis; Sarah R Mudd; John D Beaver
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Performance Evaluation of a Dedicated Preclinical PET/CT System for the Assessment of Mineralization Process in a Mouse Model of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Guillaume Rucher; Lucie Cameliere; Jihene Fendri; Ahmed Abbas; Kevin Dupont; Said Kamel; Nicolas Delcroix; Axel Dupont; Ludovic Berger; Alain Manrique
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Oxygen-15 labeled CO2, O2, and CO PET in small animals: evaluation using a 3D-mode microPET scanner and impact of reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Genki Horitsugi; Tadashi Watabe; Yasukazu Kanai; Hayato Ikeda; Hiroki Kato; Sadahiro Naka; Mana Ishibashi; Keiko Matsunaga; Kayako Isohashi; Eku Shimosegawa; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  [18F]Fludarabine-PET as a promising tool for differentiating CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma: Comparative analysis with [18F]FDG in human xenograft models.

Authors:  Narinée Hovhannisyan; Fabien Fillesoye; Stéphane Guillouet; Méziane Ibazizene; Jérôme Toutain; Fabienne Gourand; Samuel Valable; Benoit Plancoulaine; Louisa Barré
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  Quantifying and correcting for tail vein extravasation in small animal PET scans in cancer research: is there an impact on therapy assessment?

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué; Mélanie Briand; Soizic Dutoit; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.