Literature DB >> 21941029

NEMA NU-04-based performance characteristics of the LabPET-8™ small animal PET scanner.

Rameshwar Prasad1, Osman Ratib, Habib Zaidi.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to characterize the performance of the preclinical avalanche photodiode (APD)-based LabPET-8™ subsystem of the fully integrated trimodality PET/SPECT/CT Triumph™ scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 04-2008 protocol. The characterized performance parameters include the spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, counts rate performance and image-quality characteristics. The PET system is fully digital using APD-based detector modules with highly integrated electronics. The detector assembly consists of phoswich pairs of Lu(1.9)Y(0.1)SiO(5) (LYSO) and Lu(0.4)Gd(1.6)SiO(5) (LGSO) crystals with dimensions of 2 × 2 × 14 mm(3) having 7.5 cm axial and 10 cm transverse field of view (FOV). The spatial resolution and sensitivity were measured using a small (22)Na point source at different positions in the scanner's FOV. The scatter fraction and count rate characteristics were measured using mouse- and rat-sized phantoms fitted with an (18)F line source. The overall imaging capabilities of the scanner were assessed using the NEMA image-quality phantom and laboratory animal studies. The NEMA-based radial and tangential spatial resolution ranged from 1.7 mm at the center of the FOV to 2.59 mm at a radial offset of 2.5 cm and from 1.85 mm at the center of the FOV to 1.76 mm at a radial offset of 2.5 cm, respectively. Iterative reconstruction improved the spatial resolution to 0.84 mm at the center of the FOV. The total absolute system sensitivity is 12.74% for an energy window of 250-650 keV. For the mouse-sized phantom, the peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR) is 183 kcps at 2.07 MBq cc(-1), whereas the peak true count rate is 320 kcps at 2.5 MBq cc(-1) with a scatter fraction of 19%. The rat-sized phantom had a scatter fraction of 31%, with a peak NECR of 67 kcps at 0.23 MBq cc(-1) and a peak true count rate of 186 kcps at 0.27 MBq cc(-1). The average activity concentration and percentage standard deviation were 126.97 kBq ml(-1) and 7%, respectively. The performance of the LabPET-8™ scanner was characterized based on the NEMA NU 04-2008 standards. The all in all performance demonstrates that the LabPET-8™ system is able to produce high-quality and highly contrasted images in a reasonable time, and as such it is well suited for preclinical molecular imaging-based research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21941029     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/20/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Scatter characterization and correction for simultaneous multiple small-animal PET imaging.

Authors:  Rameshwar Prasad; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A cone-shaped phantom for assessment of small animal PET scatter fraction and count rate performance.

Authors:  Rameshwar Prasad; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Construction and Evaluation of a Prototype High Resolution, Silicon Photomultiplier-Based, Tandem Positron Emission Tomography System.

Authors:  Alexander V Stolin; Stan Majewski; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  NEMA characterization of the SAFIR prototype PET insert.

Authors:  Parisa Khateri; Werner Lustermann; Christian Ritzer; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Günther Dissertori
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of PETbox4, a high sensitivity dedicated PET preclinical tomograph.

Authors:  Z Gu; R Taschereau; N T Vu; H Wang; D L Prout; R W Silverman; B Bai; D B Stout; M E Phelps; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Oxygen-15 labeled CO2, O2, and CO PET in small animals: evaluation using a 3D-mode microPET scanner and impact of reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Genki Horitsugi; Tadashi Watabe; Yasukazu Kanai; Hayato Ikeda; Hiroki Kato; Sadahiro Naka; Mana Ishibashi; Keiko Matsunaga; Kayako Isohashi; Eku Shimosegawa; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  The motivations and methodology for high-throughput PET imaging of small animals in cancer research.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Eric P Visser; Stéphanie Lheureux; Natacha Heutte; Istvan Szanda; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Comments on the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standard on Performance Measurement of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs.

Authors:  Patrick Hallen; David Schug; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-02-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.