Literature DB >> 11248279

Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words.

K Rayner1, K S Binder, J Ashby, A Pollatsek.   

Abstract

We examined the initial landing position of the eyes in target words that were either predictable or unpredictable from the preceding sentence context. Although readers skipped over predictable words more than unpredictable words and spent less time on predictable words when they did fixate on them, there was no difference in the launch site of the saccade to the target word. Moreover, there was only a very small difference in the initial landing position on the target word as a function of predictability when the target words were fixated which is most parsimoniously explained by positing that a few programmed skips of the target word fell short of their intended target. These results suggest that low-level processing is primarily responsible for landing position effects in reading.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11248279     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00310-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: an evaluation of the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

2.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Learning to read upside-down: a study of perceptual expertise and its acquisition.

Authors:  Elsa Ahlén; Charlotte S Hills; Hashim M Hanif; Cristina Rubino; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading.

Authors:  Noor Al-Zanoon; Michael Dambacher; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-11

6.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

8.  Word predictability affects saccade length in Chinese reading: An evaluation of the dynamic-adjustment model.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Siyuan Guo; Lei Yu; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

9.  Frequency and Predictability Effects in Eye Fixations for Skilled and Less-Skilled Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-01-01

10.  Word-Initial Letters Influence Fixation Durations during Fluent Reading.

Authors:  Christopher J Hand; Patrick J O'Donnell; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.