Literature DB >> 23957592

Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes.

Peter F Thall1, Hoang Q Nguyen, Thomas M Braun, Muzaffar H Qazilbash.   

Abstract

A Bayesian two-stage phase I-II design is proposed for optimizing administration schedule and dose of an experimental agent based on the times to response and toxicity in the case where schedules are non-nested and qualitatively different. Sequentially adaptive decisions are based on the joint utility of the two event times. A utility function is constructed by partitioning the two-dimensional positive real quadrant of possible event time pairs into rectangles, eliciting a numerical utility for each rectangle, and fitting a smooth parametric function to the elicited values. We assume that each event time follows a gamma distribution with shape and scale parameters both modeled as functions of schedule and dose. A copula is assumed to obtain a bivariate distribution. To ensure an ethical trial, adaptive safety and efficacy acceptability conditions are imposed on the (schedule, dose) regimes. In stage 1 of the design, patients are randomized fairly among schedules and, within each schedule, a dose is chosen using a hybrid algorithm that either maximizes posterior mean utility or randomizes among acceptable doses. In stage 2, fair randomization among schedules is replaced by the hybrid algorithm. A modified version of this algorithm is used for nested schedules. Extensions of the model and utility function to accommodate death or discontinuation of follow up are described. The method is illustrated by an autologous stem cell transplantation trial in multiple myeloma, including a simulation study.
© 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive decision making; Bayesian design; Phase I/II clinical trial; Stem cell transplantation; Utility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23957592      PMCID: PMC3963428          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

1.  Determining a maximum-tolerated schedule of a cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Zheng Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Optimizing the concentration and bolus of a drug delivered by continuous infusion.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Aniko Szabo; Hoang Q Nguyen; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Adaptive randomization to improve utility-based dose-finding with bivariate ordinal outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Dose--schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation.

Authors:  Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; John D Cook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

10.  Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; Yu Shen; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.899

View more
  17 in total

1.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Optimizing natural killer cell doses for heterogeneous cancer patients on the basis of multiple event times.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Katy Rezvani
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Robust treatment comparison based on utilities of semi-competing risks in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan; Sarah McAvoy; Daniel R Gomez
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  A Bayesian Phase I/II Trial Design for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Beibei Guo; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Paul W Read; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Ralph G Zinner
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.864

8.  Dose escalation with over-dose and under-dose controls in Phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Ying Yuan; Zheng Li; Michael Kutner; Taofeek Owonikoko; Walter J Curran; Fadlo Khuri; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.728

10.  Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Emma Gerard; Sarah Zohar; Hoai-Thu Thai; Christelle Lorenzato; Marie-Karelle Riviere; Moreno Ursino
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.