Literature DB >> 26012358

Dose escalation with over-dose and under-dose controls in Phase I/II clinical trials.

Zhengjia Chen1, Ying Yuan2, Zheng Li3, Michael Kutner3, Taofeek Owonikoko4, Walter J Curran5, Fadlo Khuri4, Jeanne Kowalski6.   

Abstract

To save valuable time and resources in new drug development, Phase I/II clinical trials with toxicity control and drug efficacy as dual primary endpoints have become increasingly popular. Escalation with over-dose control (the EWOC) is a Bayesian adaptive Phase I clinical trial design that can accurately estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level and control the probability of overdosing patients during the dose allocation phase. In this paper, we extend EWOC to Phase I/II clinical trials by controlling for under-dosing with a Gumbel Copula model to provide patients with at least minimum drug efficacy. We propose a utility function to measure the composite effect of toxicity and efficacy and select the optimal dose. To deal with the common issue that the efficacy endpoint often cannot be quickly ascertained, we employ Bayesian data augmentation to handle delayed efficacy and allow for flexible patient accrual without a waiting period. Extensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed new design not only provides better therapeutic effect by reducing the probability of treating patients at under-dose levels while protecting patients from being overdosed, but also improves trial efficiency and increases the accuracy of dose recommendation for subsequent clinical trials. We apply the proposed design to a Phase I/II solid tumor trial.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian data augmentation; Escalation with over-dose control; Escalation with under-dose control; Gumbel copula model; Phase I/II clinical trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26012358      PMCID: PMC4871606          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  17 in total

1.  A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Thomas M Braun; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Adaptive randomization to improve utility-based dose-finding with bivariate ordinal outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

9.  Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Ye Cui; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Zhibo Wang; Zheng Li; Ruiyan Luo; Michael Kutner; Fadlo R Khuri; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  BAYESIAN DATA AUGMENTATION DOSE FINDING WITH CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD AND DELAYED TOXICITY.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Guosheng Yin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.083

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rapid enrollment design for finding the optimal dose in immunotherapy trials with ordered groups.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Xue; Matthew C Foster; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Two-stage design for phase I-II cancer clinical trials using continuous dose combinations of cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.680

3.  A Bayesian seamless phase I-II trial design with two stages for cancer clinical trials with drug combinations.

Authors:  José L Jiménez; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Adaptive Estimation of Personalized Maximum Tolerated Dose in Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials Based on All Toxicities and Individual Genomic Profile.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Zheng Li; Run Zhuang; Ying Yuan; Michael Kutner; Taofeek Owonikoko; Walter J Curran; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interactive calculator for operating characteristics of phase I cancer clinical trials using standard 3+3 designs.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Youyun Zheng; Zhibo Wang; Michael Kutner; Walter J Curran; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-11-07

6.  Analyses of drug combinations using missing data shortens trial periods in phase I/II oncology trials.

Authors:  Shinjo Yada; Chikuma Hamada
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-06-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.