Literature DB >> 25638752

A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Nolan A Wages1, Craig L Slingluff2, Gina R Petroni3.   

Abstract

In oncology, vaccine-based immunotherapy often investigates regimens that demonstrate minimal toxicity overall and higher doses may not correlate with greater immune response. Rather than determining the maximum tolerated dose, the goal of the study becomes locating the optimal biological dose, which is defined as a safe dose demonstrating the greatest immunogenicity, based on some predefined measure of immune response. Incorporation of adjuvants, new or optimized peptide vaccines, and combining vaccines with immune modulators may enhance immune response, with the aim of improving clinical response. Innovative dose escalation strategies are needed to establish the safety and immunogenicity of new immunologic combinations. We describe the implementation of an adaptive design for identifying the optimal treatment strategy in a multi-site, FDA-approved, phase I/II trial of a novel vaccination approach using long-peptides plus TLR agonists for resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. Operating characteristics of the design are demonstrated under various possible true scenarios via simulation studies. Overall performance indicates that the design is a practical Phase I/II adaptive method for use with combined immunotherapy agents. The simulation results demonstrate the method's ability to effectively recommend optimal regimens in a high percentage of trials with manageable sample sizes. The numerical results presented in this work include the type of simulation information that aid review boards in understanding design performance, such as average sample size and frequency of early trial termination, which we hope will augment early-phase trial design in cancer immunotherapy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological agent; Immunotherapy; Oncology; Optimal dose; Phase I/II

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25638752      PMCID: PMC4380742          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  29 in total

1.  Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.

Authors:  Sally Hunsberger; Lawrence V Rubinstein; Janet Dancey; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Challenges and pitfalls of combining targeted agents in phase I studies.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The current design of oncology phase I clinical trials: progressing from algorithms to statistical models.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03

4.  Clinical trial designs for the early clinical development of therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  R M Simon; S M Steinberg; M Hamilton; A Hildesheim; S Khleif; L W Kwak; C L Mackall; J Schlom; S L Topalian; J A Berzofsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Advances in the development of cancer immunotherapies.

Authors:  Jianjun Gao; Chantale Bernatchez; Padmanee Sharma; Laszlo G Radvanyi; Patrick Hwu
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 16.687

6.  Effect of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor on circulating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses to a multipeptide melanoma vaccine: outcome of a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni; Walter C Olson; Mark E Smolkin; Merrick I Ross; Naomi B Haas; William W Grosh; Marc E Boisvert; John M Kirkwood; Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  IFN-alpha enhances peptide vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell numbers, effector function, and antitumor activity.

Authors:  Andrew G Sikora; Nina Jaffarzad; Yared Hailemichael; Alexander Gelbard; Spencer W Stonier; Kimberly S Schluns; Loredana Frasca; Yanyan Lou; Chengwen Liu; Helen A Andersson; Patrick Hwu; Willem W Overwijk
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Is the "3+3" dose-escalation phase I clinical trial design suitable for therapeutic cancer vaccine development? A recommendation for alternative design.

Authors:  Osama E Rahma; Emily Gammoh; Richard M Simon; Samir N Khleif
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Phase I/II adaptive design for drug combination oncology trials.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  15 in total

1.  Flexible Phase I-II design for partially ordered regimens with application to therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-06-04

2.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: early-phase adaptive design for combination immunotherapies.

Authors:  N A Wages; C L Slingluff; G R Petroni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Implementation of adaptive methods in early-phase clinical trials.

Authors:  Gina R Petroni; Nolan A Wages; Gautier Paux; Frédéric Dubois
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Anastasia Ivanova; Olga Marchenko
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Tailoring early-phase clinical trial design to address multiple research objectives.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Timothy N Bullock; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 6.968

6.  Two-stage design for phase I-II cancer clinical trials using continuous dose combinations of cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.680

Review 7.  Novel strategies in immune checkpoint inhibitor drug development: How far are we from the paradigm shift?

Authors:  Geoffrey Alan Watson; Jeffrey Doi; Aaron Richard Hansen; Anna Spreafico
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Revisiting isotonic phase I design in the era of model-assisted dose-finding.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  A Bayesian design for phase I cancer therapeutic vaccine trials.

Authors:  Chenguang Wang; Gary L Rosner; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Immuno-oncology combinations: raising the tail of the survival curve.

Authors:  Samuel J Harris; Jessica Brown; Juanita Lopez; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.248

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.