Literature DB >> 18084008

Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks.

B Nebiyou Bekele1, Yuan Ji, Yu Shen, Peter F Thall.   

Abstract

Late-onset (LO) toxicities are a serious concern in many phase I trials. Since most dose-limiting toxicities occur soon after therapy begins, most dose-finding methods use a binary indicator of toxicity occurring within a short initial time period. If an agent causes LO toxicities, however, an undesirably large number of patients may be treated at toxic doses before any toxicities are observed. A method addressing this problem is the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM, Cheung and Chappell, 2000). We propose a Bayesian dose-finding method similar to the TITE-CRM in which doses are chosen using time-to-toxicity data. The new aspect of our method is a set of rules, based on predictive probabilities, that temporarily suspend accrual if the risk of toxicity at prospective doses for future patients is unacceptably high. If additional follow-up data reduce the predicted risk of toxicity to an acceptable level, then accrual is restarted, and this process may be repeated several times during the trial. A simulation study shows that the proposed method provides a greater degree of safety than the TITE-CRM, while still reliably choosing the preferred dose. This advantage increases with accrual rate, but the price of this additional safety is that the trial takes longer to complete on average.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18084008      PMCID: PMC3294317          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  8 in total

1.  Sequential ordinal modeling with applications to survival data.

Authors:  J H Albert; S Chib
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Bayesian inference on order-constrained parameters in generalized linear models.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Brian Neelon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Accrual strategies for phase I trials with delayed patient outcome.

Authors:  P F Thall; J J Lee; C H Tseng; E H Estey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A solution to the problem of monotone likelihood in Cox regression.

Authors:  G Heinze; M Schemper
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A Bayesian model-free approach to combination therapy phase I trials using censored time-to-toxicity data.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 3.  Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  Advances in Statistical Approaches Oncology Drug Development.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Gary L Rosner; Olga Marchenko; Tom Parke; Inna Perevozskaya; Yanping Wang
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Thomas M Braun; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Enrollment and Stopping Rules for Managing Toxicity Requiring Long Follow-Up in Phase II Oncology Trials.

Authors:  Guochen Song; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Bayesian Dose-Finding in Two Treatment Cycles Based on the Joint Utility of Efficacy and Toxicity.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Yuan Ji; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Risk-group-specific dose finding based on an average toxicity score.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.