Literature DB >> 28255183

Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.

Peter F Thall1, Hoang Q Nguyen1, Ralph G Zinner2.   

Abstract

A Bayesian model and design are described for a phase I-II trial to jointly optimise the doses of a targeted agent and a chemotherapy agent for solid tumors. A challenge in designing the trial was that both the efficacy and toxicity outcomes were defined as four-level ordinal variables. To reflect possibly complex joint effects of the two doses on each of the two outcomes, for each marginal distribution a generalised continuation ratio model was assumed, with each agent's dose parametrically standardised in the linear term. A copula was assumed to obtain a bivariate distribution. Elicited outcome probabilities were used to construct a prior, with variances calibrated to obtain small prior effective sample size. Elicited numerical utilities of the 16 elementary outcomes were used to compute posterior mean utilities as criteria for selecting dose pairs, with adaptive randomisation to reduce the risk of getting stuck at a suboptimal pair. A simulation study showed that parametric dose standardisation with additive dose effects provides a robust, reliable model for dose pair optimisation in this setting, and it compares favourably with designs based on alternative models that include dose-dose interaction terms. The proposed model and method are applicable generally to other clinical trial settings with similar dose and outcome structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian design; adaptive design; combination trial; ordinal variables; phase I-II clinical trial; utility

Year:  2016        PMID: 28255183      PMCID: PMC5328131          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  27 in total

1.  Optimizing Sedative Dose in Preterm Infants Undergoing Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Sarah Zohar; Pierre Maton
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  BAYESIAN PHASE I/II ADAPTIVELY RANDOMIZED ONCOLOGY TRIALS WITH COMBINED DRUGS.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  A curve-free method for phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  M Gasparini; J Eisele
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A Bayesian dose-finding procedure for phase I clinical trials based only on the assumption of monotonicity.

Authors:  John Whitehead; Helene Thygesen; Anne Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Elicitation of health state utilities in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul Swinburn; Andrew Lloyd; Paul Nathan; Toni K Choueiri; David Cella; Maureen P Neary
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Optimizing the concentration and bolus of a drug delivered by continuous infusion.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Aniko Szabo; Hoang Q Nguyen; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Bayesian procedures for phase I/II clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of drug combinations.

Authors:  John Whitehead; Helene Thygesen; Anne Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  Implementation of a Model-Based Design in a Phase Ib Study of Combined Targeted Agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig A Portell; Michael E Williams; Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  A latent variable model for improving inference in trials assessing the effect of dose on toxicity and composite efficacy endpoints.

Authors:  James Ms Wason; Shaun R Seaman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  A Phase I-II Basket Trial Design to Optimize Dose-Schedule Regimes Based on Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.728

4.  Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial.

Authors:  Kristian Brock; Lucinda Billingham; Mhairi Copland; Shamyla Siddique; Mirjana Sirovica; Christina Yap
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.