Literature DB >> 21401568

Optimizing the concentration and bolus of a drug delivered by continuous infusion.

Peter F Thall1, Aniko Szabo, Hoang Q Nguyen, Catherine M Amlie-Lefond, Osama O Zaidat.   

Abstract

We consider treatment regimes in which an agent is administered continuously at a specified concentration until either a response is achieved or a predetermined maximum infusion time is reached. Response is an event defined to characterize therapeutic efficacy. A portion of the maximum planned total amount administered is given as an initial bolus. For such regimes, the amount of the agent received by the patient depends on the time to response. An additional complication when response is evaluated periodically rather than continuously is that the response time is interval censored. We address the problem of designing a clinical trial in which such response time data and a binary indicator of toxicity are used together to jointly optimize the concentration and the size of the bolus. We propose a sequentially adaptive Bayesian design that chooses the optimal treatment for successive patients by maximizing the posterior mean utility of the joint efficacy-toxicity outcome. The methodology is illustrated by a trial in which tissue plasminogen activator is infused intraarterially as rapid treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21401568      PMCID: PMC3137757          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Neurologic outcome in survivors of childhood arterial ischemic stroke and sinovenous thrombosis.

Authors:  G A deVeber; D MacGregor; R Curtis; S Mayank
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  P F Thall; R M Simon; E H Estey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Simulation as a design tool for phase I/II clinical trials: an example from bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  T A Gooley; P J Martin; L D Fisher; M Pettinger
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1994-12

6.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  The neurotoxicity of tissue plasminogen activator?

Authors:  Jaspreet Kaur; Zonghang Zhao; Gary M Klein; Eng H Lo; Alastair M Buchan
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

10.  Utility-based optimization of combination therapy using ordinal toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II trials.

Authors:  Nadine Houede; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Xavier Paoletti; Andrew Kramar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimizing Sedative Dose in Preterm Infants Undergoing Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Sarah Zohar; Pierre Maton
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Thomas M Braun; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Ralph G Zinner
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Effective sample size for computing prior hyperparameters in Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Richard C Herrick; Hoang Q Nguyen; John J Venier; J Clift Norris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  A modular framework for early-phase seamless oncology trials.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Thomas M Braun; Elizabeth C Chase
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.