Literature DB >> 21335024

Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: some potential pitfalls and remedies.

Carlos Aguilar1, Eric Castet.   

Abstract

Many important results in visual neuroscience rely on the use of gaze-contingent retinal stabilization techniques. Our work focuses on the important fraction of these studies that is concerned with the retinal stabilization of visual filters that degrade some specific portions of the visual field. For instance, macular scotomas, often induced by age related macular degeneration, can be simulated by continuously displaying a gaze-contingent mask in the center of the visual field. The gaze-contingent rules used in most of these studies imply only a very minimal processing of ocular data. By analyzing the relationship between gaze and scotoma locations for different oculo-motor patterns, we show that such a minimal processing might have adverse perceptual and oculomotor consequences due mainly to two potential problems: (a) a transient blink-induced motion of the scotoma while gaze is static, and (b) the intrusion of post-saccadic slow eye movements. We have developed new gaze-contingent rules to solve these two problems. We have also suggested simple ways of tackling two unrecognized problems that are a potential source of mismatch between gaze and scotoma locations. Overall, the present work should help design, describe and test the paradigms used to simulate retinopathy with gaze-contingent displays.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21335024     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Trajectory prediction of saccadic eye movements using a compressed exponential model.

Authors:  Peng Han; Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Aperture extent and stimulus speed affect the perception of visual acceleration.

Authors:  Alexandra S Mueller; Esther G González; Chris McNorgan; Martin J Steinbach; Brian Timney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visualizing Visual Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Katherine E M Tregillus
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Unconscious priming by illusory figures: the role of the salient region.

Authors:  Tommaso Poscoliero; Carlo Alberto Marzi; Massimo Girelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Real-time sharing of gaze data between multiple eye trackers-evaluation, tools, and advice.

Authors:  Marcus Nyström; Diederick C Niehorster; Tim Cornelissen; Henrik Garde
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

6.  Cortical Reorganization of Peripheral Vision Induced by Simulated Central Vision Loss.

Authors:  Nihong Chen; Kilho Shin; Rachel Millin; Yongqian Song; MiYoung Kwon; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Rapid and persistent adaptability of human oculomotor control in response to simulated central vision loss.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Contour enhancement benefits older adults with simulated central field loss.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Premnandhini Satgunam; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Effects of contour enhancement on low-vision preference and visual search.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo; P Matthew Bronstad; Zachary Reynolds; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.