Literature DB >> 10341953

Different motor systems use similar damped extraretinal eye position information.

C J Bockisch1, J M Miller.   

Abstract

Extraretinal eye position information (EEPI) shifts the directional significance of retinal loci by an angle roughly equal to that of an associated saccade, with the shift reported to begin 0-250 ms before the saccade and to continue apace with the saccade, or sluggishly, over a period as much as an order of magnitude longer. These different estimates of remapping initiation and duration could be due to various factors, including different localizing responses, retinal loci of probe flashes, and saccade target predictability. We compared manual and gaze pointing to probe flashes at controlled retinal loci under identical stimulus conditions and in the same subjects, and found that EEPI was similar: both hand and gaze pointing EEPI shifted over about 140 ms, beginning about 50 ms before the saccade. For both pointing responses, remapping appeared to be initiated later for parafoveal loci than for loci 10 degrees to either side. We found no effect of saccade target predictability. We show that variability in EEPI and sensory processing only slightly (approximately 5%) inflates estimates of EEPI shift duration. Based on our results, and comparisons with recent studies, we argue that similar EEPI parameters apply to hand pointing, eye pointing and visual comparisons, and that remaining differences across studies can reasonably be attributed to differences in stimulus conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10341953     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00205-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Curvature of visual space under vertical eye rotation: implications for spatial vision and visuomotor control.

Authors:  J D Crawford; D Y Henriques; T Vilis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Rhesus monkeys mislocalize saccade targets flashed for 100ms around the time of a saccade.

Authors:  S Morgan Jeffries; Makoto Kusunoki; James W Bisley; Ian S Cohen; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Fusion of visual and auditory stimuli during saccades: a Bayesian explanation for perisaccadic distortions.

Authors:  Paola Binda; Aurelio Bruno; David C Burr; Maria C Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

5.  Oculomotor Adaptation Elicited By Intra-Saccadic Visual Stimulation: Time-Course of Efficient Visual Target Perturbation.

Authors:  Muriel T N Panouillères; Valerie Gaveau; Jeremy Debatisse; Patricia Jacquin; Marie LeBlond; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.