Literature DB >> 30153240

Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems: Are We There Yet?

Ashley D Deemer, Christopher K Bradley1, Nicole C Ross2, Danielle M Natale3, Rath Itthipanichpong1, Frank S Werblin4, Robert W Massof1.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Head-mounted video display systems and image processing as a means of enhancing low vision are ideas that have been around for more than 20 years. Recent developments in virtual and augmented reality technology and software have opened up new research opportunities that will lead to benefits for low vision patients. Since the Visionics low vision enhancement system (LVES), the first head-mounted video display LVES, was engineered 20 years ago, various other devices have come and gone with a recent resurgence of the technology over the past few years. In this article, we discuss the history of the development of LVESs, describe the current state of available technology by outlining existing systems, and explore future innovation and research in this area. Although LVESs have now been around for more than two decades, there is still much that remains to be explored. With the growing popularity and availability of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies, we can now integrate these methods within low vision rehabilitation to conduct more research on customized contrast-enhancement strategies, image motion compensation, image-remapping strategies, and binocular disparity, all while incorporating eye-tracking capabilities. Future research should use this available technology and knowledge to learn more about the visual system in the low vision patient and extract this new information to create prescribable vision enhancement solutions for the visually impaired individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30153240      PMCID: PMC6119088          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  52 in total

1.  Predictors of functional success in telescopic spectacle use by low vision patients.

Authors:  J L Demer; F I Porter; J Goldberg; H A Jenkins; K Schmidt; I Ulrich
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Contrast thresholds for letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  K R Alexander; D J Derlacki; G A Fishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Resolution and contrast sensitivity at low luminances.

Authors:  A van Meeteren; J J Vos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Gary S Rubin; Aimee T Broman; Beatriz Muñoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen Turano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; R L Gregory
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

9.  Evaluation of a gaze-controlled vision enhancement system for reading in visually impaired people.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilar; Eric Castet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Treatment Paradigm for the Implantable Miniature Telescope.

Authors:  Vincent S Hau; Nikolas London; Michelle Dalton
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-04-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Toward Improving the Mobility of Patients with Peripheral Visual Field Defects with Novel Digital Spectacles.

Authors:  Ahmed M Sayed; Rashed Kashem; Mostafa Abdel-Mottaleb; Vatookarn Roongpoovapatr; Taher K Eleiwa; Mohamed Abdel-Mottaleb; Richard K Parrish; Mohamed Abou Shousha
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Personalized Telerehabilitation for a Head-mounted Low Vision Aid: A Randomized Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Marie-Céline Lorenzini; Walter Wittich
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.

Authors:  Irina Sverdlichenko; Mark S Mandelcorn; Galia Issashar Leibovitzh; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Samuel N Markowitz; Luminita Tarita-Nistor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Preliminary Evaluation of Two Digital Image Processing Strategies for Head-Mounted Magnification for Low Vision Patients.

Authors:  Ashley D Deemer; Bonnielin K Swenor; Kyoko Fujiwara; James T Deremeik; Nicole C Ross; Danielle M Natale; Chris K Bradley; Frank S Werblin; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Contribution of Short-Time Occlusion of the Amblyopic Eye to a Passive Dichoptic Video Treatment for Amblyopia beyond the Critical Period.

Authors:  Lauren Sauvan; Natacha Stolowy; Danièle Denis; Frédéric Matonti; Frédéric Chavane; Robert F Hess; Alexandre Reynaud
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Everyday visual demands of people with low vision: A mixed methods real-life recording study.

Authors:  Sandra D Starke; Eugenie Golubova; Michael D Crossland; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  QD laser eyewear as a visual field aid in a visual field defect model.

Authors:  Chigusa Iyama; Yuta Shigeno; Eri Hirano; Mamoru Kamoshita; Norihiro Nagai; Misa Suzuki; Sakiko Minami; Toshihide Kurihara; Hideki Sonobe; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Hajime Shinoda; Kazuo Tsubota; Yoko Ozawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Measuring changes in device use of a head-mounted low vision aid after personalised telerehabilitation: protocol for a feasibility study.

Authors:  Marie-Céline Lorenzini; Walter Wittich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Ability of Head-Mounted Display Technology to Improve Mobility in People With Low Vision: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hein Min Htike; Tom H Margrain; Yu-Kun Lai; Parisa Eslambolchilar
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Mobility improvement of patients with peripheral visual field losses using novel see-through digital spectacles.

Authors:  Ahmed M Sayed; Mohamed Abou Shousha; M D Baharul Islam; Taher K Eleiwa; Rashed Kashem; Mostafa Abdel-Mottaleb; Eyup Ozcan; Mohamed Tolba; Jane C Cook; Richard K Parrish
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.