Literature DB >> 29204647

The Preferred Retinal Locus Used to Watch Videos.

Francisco M Costela1,2, Sidika Kajtezovic1, Russell L Woods1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Eccentric viewing is a common strategy used by people with central vision loss (CVL) to direct the eye such that the image falls onto functioning peripheral retina, known as the preferred retinal locus (PRL). It has been long acknowledged that we do not know whether the PRL used in a fixation test is also used when performing tasks. We present an innovative method to determine whether the same PRL observed during a fixation task was used to watch videos and whether poor resolution affects gaze location.
Methods: The gaze of a group of 60 normal vision (NV) observers was used to define a democratic center of interest (COI) of video clips from movies and television. For each CVL participant (N = 20), we computed the gaze offsets from the COI across the video clips. The distribution of gaze offsets of the NV participants was used to define the limits of NV behavior. If the gaze offset was within this 95% degree confidence interval, we presumed that the same PRL was used for fixation and video watching. Another 15 NV participants watched the video clips with various levels of defocus blur.
Results: CVL participants had wider gaze-offset distributions than NV participants (P < 0.001). Gaze offsets of 18/20 CVL participants were outside the NV confidence interval. Further, none of the 15 NV participants watching the same videos with spherical defocus blur had a gaze offset that was decentered (outside the NV confidence interval), suggesting that resolution was not the problem. Conclusions: This indicates that many CVL participants were using a PRL to view videos that differed from that found with a fixation task and that it was not caused by poor resolution alone. The relationship between these locations needs further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29204647      PMCID: PMC5714047          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  39 in total

1.  Reading with multiple preferred retinal loci: implications for training a more efficient reading strategy.

Authors:  A Déruaz; A R Whatham; C Mermoud; A B Safran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Evaluation of a new quantitative technique to assess the number and extent of preferred retinal loci in macular disease.

Authors:  M D Crossland; M Sims; R F Galbraith; G S Rubin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attention and the evolution of Hollywood film.

Authors:  James E Cutting; Jordan E DeLong; Christine E Nothelfer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-05

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Psychological and cognitive determinants of vision function in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Barry W Rovner; Robin J Casten; Robert W Massof; Benjamin E Leiby; William S Tasman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07

6.  The role of primary and secondary control in adaptation to age-related vision loss: a study of older adults with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Hans-Werner Wahl; Stefanie Becker; David Burmedi; Oliver Schilling
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-03

7.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

8.  The Role of External Features in Face Recognition with Central Vision Loss.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Peter J Bex; Russell L Woods
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Measuring information acquisition from sensory input using automated scoring of natural-language descriptions.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Peter J Bex; Dylan J Rose; Russell L Woods
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating Reading Performance in Different Preferred Retinal Loci in Persian-Speaking Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Abdollah Farzaneh; Abbas Riazi; Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani; Asgar Doostdar; Mohammad Kamali; Ahad Sedaghat; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-26

2.  An implementation of Bubble Magnification did not improve the video comprehension of individuals with central vision loss.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Stephanie M Reeves; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  The Effect of Simulated Central Field Loss on Street-crossing Decision-Making in Young Adult Pedestrians.

Authors:  Essam S Almutleb; Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Saccade Landing Point Prediction Based on Fine-Grained Learning Method.

Authors:  Aythami Morales; Francisco M Costela; Russell L Woods
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Daniel R Saunders; Dylan J Rose; Sidika Katjezovic; Stephanie M Reeves; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effect of Background Brightness on Preferred Retinal Loci in Patients With Macular Disease.

Authors:  Tomoko Ro-Mase; Satoshi Ishiko; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.