Literature DB >> 15687796

Gaze-contingent displays: a review.

Andrew T Duchowski1, Nathan Cournia, Hunter Murphy.   

Abstract

Gaze-contingent displays (GCDs) attempt to balance the amount of information displayed against the visual information processing capacity of the observer through real-time eye movement sensing. Based on the assumed knowledge of the instantaneous location of the observer's focus of attention, GCD content can be "tuned" through several display processing means. Screen-based displays alter pixel level information generally matching the resolvability of the human retina in an effort to maximize bandwidth. Model-based displays alter geometric-level primitives along similar goals. Attentive user interfaces (AUIs) manage object- level entities (e.g., windows, applications) depending on the assumed attentive state of the observer. Such real-time display manipulation is generally achieved through non-contact, unobtrusive tracking of the observer's eye movements. This paper briefly reviews past and present display techniques as well as emerging graphics and eye tracking technology for GCD development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15687796     DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav        ISSN: 1094-9313


  12 in total

1.  Trajectory prediction of saccadic eye movements using a compressed exponential model.

Authors:  Peng Han; Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Unconscious priming by illusory figures: the role of the salient region.

Authors:  Tommaso Poscoliero; Carlo Alberto Marzi; Massimo Girelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  It's in your eyes--using gaze-contingent stimuli to create truly interactive paradigms for social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

Authors:  Marcus Wilms; Leonhard Schilbach; Ulrich Pfeiffer; Gary Bente; Gereon R Fink; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Dynamic gaze-position prediction of saccadic eye movements using a Taylor series.

Authors:  Shuhang Wang; Russell L Woods; Francisco M Costela; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

6.  The applicability of eye-controlled highlighting to the field of visual searching.

Authors:  Qijun Wang; Mengdan Sun; Hongyan Liu; Yunxian Pan; Li Wang; Liezhong Ge
Journal:  Aust J Psychol       Date:  2018-02-26

7.  Microsaccade generation requires a foveal anchor.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Rachel E Langston; Francisco Costela; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 0.957

8.  Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Lester C Loschky; Ryan V Ringer; Aaron P Johnson; Adam M Larson; Mark Neider; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-14

9.  Intact Contextual Cueing for Search in Realistic Scenes with Simulated Central or Peripheral Vision Loss.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Franziska Geringswald; Ping Wei; Eleonora Porracin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Multi-step planning of eye movements in visual search.

Authors:  David Hoppe; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.