Literature DB >> 23945955

How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.

Jana Besser1, Thomas Koelewijn, Adriana A Zekveld, Sophia E Kramer, Joost M Festen.   

Abstract

The ability to recognize masked speech, commonly measured with a speech reception threshold (SRT) test, is associated with cognitive processing abilities. Two cognitive factors frequently assessed in speech recognition research are the capacity of working memory (WM), measured by means of a reading span (Rspan) or listening span (Lspan) test, and the ability to read masked text (linguistic closure), measured by the text reception threshold (TRT). The current article provides a review of recent hearing research that examined the relationship of TRT and WM span to SRTs in various maskers. Furthermore, modality differences in WM capacity assessed with the Rspan compared to the Lspan test were examined and related to speech recognition abilities in an experimental study with young adults with normal hearing (NH). Span scores were strongly associated with each other, but were higher in the auditory modality. The results of the reviewed studies suggest that TRT and WM span are related to each other, but differ in their relationships with SRT performance. In NH adults of middle age or older, both TRT and Rspan were associated with SRTs in speech maskers, whereas TRT better predicted speech recognition in fluctuating nonspeech maskers. The associations with SRTs in steady-state noise were inconclusive for both measures. WM span was positively related to benefit from contextual information in speech recognition, but better TRTs related to less interference from unrelated cues. Data for individuals with impaired hearing are limited, but larger WM span seems to give a general advantage in various listening situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  linguistic closure; speech recognition; text reception threshold; working memory span

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23945955      PMCID: PMC4070613          DOI: 10.1177/1084713813495459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  63 in total

1.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise.

Authors:  Kirsten Wagener; Jane Lignel Josvassen; Regitze Ardenkjaer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: what is the role for working memory capacity?

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  On the use of the distortion-sensitivity approach in examining the role of linguistic abilities in speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  S Theo Goverts; Elke Huysmans; Sophia E Kramer; Annette M B de Groot; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner; Michael Syskind Pedersen; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  The design and use of a new near-vision chart.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-06

7.  Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.

Authors:  Jamie L Desjardins; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

9.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Clinical Working Memory Tests and Their Prediction of Fluid Intelligence.

Authors:  Jill T Shelton; Emily M Elliott; B D Hill; Matthew R Calamia; Wm Drew Gouvier
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2009-05-01

10.  Processing load induced by informational masking is related to linguistic abilities.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Joost M Festen; Jerker Rönnberg; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-03
View more
  46 in total

1.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jӧrg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Long-term musical experience and auditory and visual perceptual abilities under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Daniel Fogerty; Kimberly Smith; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory, Compressor Speed, and Background Noise Characteristics.

Authors:  Barbara Ohlenforst; Pamela E Souza; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Hannah M Willison; Maya S Freund
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.