Literature DB >> 28945658

Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.

Cynthia R Hunter1, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Listening effort (LE) induced by speech degradation reduces performance on concurrent cognitive tasks. However, a converse effect of extrinsic cognitive load on recognition of spoken words in sentences has not been shown. The aims of the present study were to (a) examine the impact of extrinsic cognitive load on spoken word recognition in a sentence recognition task and (b) determine whether cognitive load and/or LE needed to understand spectrally degraded speech would differentially affect word recognition in high- and low-predictability sentences. Downstream effects of speech degradation and sentence predictability on the cognitive load task were also examined.
DESIGN: One hundred twenty young adults identified sentence-final spoken words in high- and low-predictability Speech Perception in Noise sentences. Cognitive load consisted of a preload of short (low-load) or long (high-load) sequences of digits, presented visually before each spoken sentence and reported either before or after identification of the sentence-final word. LE was varied by spectrally degrading sentences with four-, six-, or eight-channel noise vocoding. Level of spectral degradation and order of report (digits first or words first) were between-participants variables. Effects of cognitive load, sentence predictability, and speech degradation on accuracy of sentence-final word identification as well as recall of preload digit sequences were examined.
RESULTS: In addition to anticipated main effects of sentence predictability and spectral degradation on word recognition, we found an effect of cognitive load, such that words were identified more accurately under low load than high load. However, load differentially affected word identification in high- and low-predictability sentences depending on the level of sentence degradation. Under severe spectral degradation (four-channel vocoding), the effect of cognitive load on word identification was present for high-predictability sentences but not for low-predictability sentences. Under mild spectral degradation (eight-channel vocoding), the effect of load was present for low-predictability sentences but not for high-predictability sentences. There were also reliable downstream effects of speech degradation and sentence predictability on recall of the preload digit sequences. Long digit sequences were more easily recalled following spoken sentences that were less spectrally degraded. When digits were reported after identification of sentence-final words, short digit sequences were recalled more accurately when the spoken sentences were predictable.
CONCLUSIONS: Extrinsic cognitive load can impair recognition of spectrally degraded spoken words in a sentence recognition task. Cognitive load affected word identification in both high- and low-predictability sentences, suggesting that load may impact both context use and lower-level perceptual processes. Consistent with prior work, LE also had downstream effects on memory for visual digit sequences. Results support the proposal that extrinsic cognitive load and LE induced by signal degradation both draw on a central, limited pool of cognitive resources that is used to recognize spoken words in sentences under adverse listening conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28945658      PMCID: PMC5821552          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  59 in total

1.  Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging?

Authors:  P B Baltes; U Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-03

4.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Working memory affects older adults' use of context in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Esther Janse; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory.

Authors:  P M Rabbitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

10.  Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Richard J S Wise; M Alex Dresner; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluating Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Encoding, Storage, and Retrieval Strategies in Verbal Working Memory.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  When Additional Training Isn't Enough: Further Evidence That Unpredictable Speech Inhibits Adaptation.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Cassidy Flechaus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Dual-Task Accuracy and Response Time Index Effects of Spoken Sentence Predictability and Cognitive Load on Listening Effort.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Poor Performer: A Distinct Entity in Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Kirsten Oberländer; Imme Haubitz; Rebecca Carroll; Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.213

7.  Exploring the Link Between Cognitive Abilities and Speech Recognition in the Elderly Under Different Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Theresa Nuesse; Rike Steenken; Tobias Neher; Inga Holube
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-11

8.  Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ashley N Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 9.  Listening Effort Informed Quality of Experience Evaluation.

Authors:  Pheobe Wenyi Sun; Andrew Hines
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-05

10.  Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Michael F Barry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.297

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.