Literature DB >> 12564511

Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise.

Kirsten Wagener1, Jane Lignel Josvassen, Regitze Ardenkjaer.   

Abstract

The Danish sentence test DANTALE II was developed in analogy to the Swedish sentence test by Hagerman and the German Oldenburg sentence test as a new Danish sentence test in noise to determine the speech reception threshold in noise (SRT, i.e. the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that yields 500% intelligibility). Each sentence is generated by a random combination of the alternatives of a base list. This base list consists of 10 sentences with the same syntactical structure (name, verb, numeral, adjective, object). The test sentences were recorded and segmented in such a way that the coarticulation effects were taken into account in order to achieve a high perceived sound quality of the resynthesized sentences: 100 sentences were recorded, each coarticulation between each word and the 10 possible following word alternatives were recorded, and the correct coarticulation was used to generate the test sentences. Word-specific speech recognition curves were measured for each recorded word to optimize the homogeneity of the speech material and the measurement accuracy. Level corrections of particular words and a careful selection of the test lists produced a noticeable reduction in the variation in the distribution of word-specific SRT (standard deviation 1.75 dB instead of 3.78 dB). Therefore, the slope of the total intelligibility function was expected to increase from 8.30%/dB (raw test material) to 13.2%/dB (after modification). These theoretical expectations were evaluated by independent measurements with normal-hearing subjects, and, for the most part, confirmed. The reference data for the DANTALE II are: SRT=-8.43 dB SNR; slope at SRT, s50 = 13.2%/dB. The training effect was 2.2 dB and could be reduced to less than 1 dB if two training lists of 20 sentences were performed prior to data collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12564511     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309056080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  22 in total

1.  The effects of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise.

Authors:  Rebecca Carroll; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

Review 2.  Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

3.  The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.

Authors:  Arun Narayanan; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

Review 5.  The design of a project to assess bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Stuart Gatehouse; Jürgen Kiessling; Graham Naylor; Hans Verschuure; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

Review 6.  How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.

Authors:  Jana Besser; Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-08-13

7.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Edraki; Wai-Yip Chan; Jesper Jensen; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-24

9.  Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Eline B Petersen; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser; Stefan Stenfelt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

10.  Improved Speech in Noise Perception in the Elderly After 6 Months of Musical Instruction.

Authors:  Florian Worschech; Damien Marie; Kristin Jünemann; Christopher Sinke; Tillmann H C Krüger; Michael Großbach; Daniel S Scholz; Laura Abdili; Matthias Kliegel; Clara E James; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.