Literature DB >> 26158403

Development and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension.

Virginia Best1,2, Gitte Keidser1, Jӧrg M Buchholz1,3, Katrina Freeston1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The overall goal of this work is to create new speech perception tests that more closely resemble real world communication and offer an alternative or complement to the commonly used sentence recall test.
DESIGN: We describe the development of a new ongoing speech comprehension test based on short everyday passages and on-the-go questions. We also describe the results of an experiment conducted to compare the psychometric properties of this test to those of a sentence test. STUDY SAMPLE: Both tests were completed by a group of listeners that included normal hearers as well as hearing-impaired listeners who participated with and without their hearing aids.
RESULTS: Overall, the psychometric properties of the two tests were similar, and thresholds were significantly correlated. However, there was some evidence of age/cognitive effects in the comprehension test that were not revealed by the sentence test.
CONCLUSIONS: This new comprehension test promises to be useful for the larger goal of creating laboratory tests that combine realistic acoustic environments with realistic communication tasks. Further efforts will be required to assess whether the test can ultimately improve predictions of real-world outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Speech comprehension; hearing aids; hearing loss; realistic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158403      PMCID: PMC4762876          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1055835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  25 in total

1.  Factors associated with the accuracy of subjective assessments of hearing impairment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Kamil; Dane J Genther; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Cognition and hearing aids.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

4.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measuring the ability of hearing impaired children to understand connected discourse: a comparison of two methods.

Authors:  J Kei; V Smyth
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1997-08

6.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  B Hagerman
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1982

7.  Factors influencing individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Elizabeth Convery; Jorge Mejia
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Age differences in episodic memory, semantic memory, and priming: relationships to demographic, intellectual, and biological factors.

Authors:  L Nyberg; L Bäckman; K Erngrund; U Olofsson; L G Nilsson
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale; Nathan S Rose
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Speech audiometry, speech perception, and cognitive functions : English version.

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Speech audiometry, speech perception and cognitive functions. German version].

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Development of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise test.

Authors:  Kelly M Miles; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Timothy Beechey; Virginia Best; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jörg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Development of Improved Software Intelligent System for Audiological Solutions.

Authors:  S Rajkumar; S Muttan; V Sapthagirivasan; V Jaya; S S Vignesh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  A Flexible Question-and-Answer Task for Measuring Speech Understanding.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Timothy Streeter; Elin Roverud; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.

Authors:  Baljeet Rana; Jörg M Buchholz; Catherine Morgan; Mridula Sharma; Tobias Weller; Shivali Appaiah Konganda; Kyoko Shirai; Atsushi Kawano
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures.

Authors:  Katie Neal; Catherine M McMahon; Sarah E Hughes; Isabelle Boisvert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-10

9.  The Self-Assessed Békesy Procedure: Validation of a Method to Measure Intelligibility of Connected Discourse.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Neetha Das; Eline Verschueren; Tom Francart
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.