Literature DB >> 30458532

Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.

Valeriy Shafiro1, Daniel Fogerty2, Kimberly Smith3, Stanley Sheft1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Visual recognition of interrupted text may predict speech intelligibility under adverse listening conditions. This study investigated the nature of the linguistic information and perceptual processes underlying this relationship. Method: To directly compare the perceptual organization of interrupted speech and text, we examined the recognition of spoken and printed sentences interrupted at different rates in 14 adults with normal hearing. The interruption method approximated deletion and retention of rate-specific linguistic information (0.5-64 Hz) in speech by substituting either white space or silent intervals for text or speech in the original sentences.
Results: A similar U-shaped pattern of cross-rate variation in performance was observed in both modalities, with minima at 2 Hz. However, at the highest and lowest interruption rates, recognition accuracy was greater for text than speech, whereas the reverse was observed at middle rates. An analysis of word duration and the frequency of word sampling across interruption rates suggested that the location of the function minima was influenced by perceptual reconstruction of whole words. Overall, the findings indicate a high degree of similarity in the perceptual organization of interrupted speech and text.
Conclusion: The observed rate-specific variation in the perception of speech and text may potentially affect the degree to which recognition accuracy in one modality is predictive of the other.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30458532      PMCID: PMC6428238          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  36 in total

1.  The redundancy of phonemes in sentential context.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  J C van Rooij; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition.

Authors:  C S Watson; W W Qiu; M M Chamberlain; X Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The perception of rhythm in language.

Authors:  A Cutler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age.

Authors:  Jefta D Saija; Elkan G Akyürek; Tjeerd C Andringa; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07

10.  Cognitive processing load during listening is reduced more by decreasing voice similarity than by increasing spatial separation between target and masker speech.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Mary Rudner; Sophia E Kramer; Johannes Lyzenga; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  4 in total

1.  Combining partial information from speech and text.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Irraj Iftikhar; Rachel Madorskiy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  The common limitations in auditory temporal processing for Mandarin Chinese and Japanese.

Authors:  Hikaru Eguchi; Kazuo Ueda; Gerard B Remijn; Yoshitaka Nakajima; Hiroshige Takeichi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Auditory grouping is necessary to understand interrupted mosaic speech stimuli.

Authors:  Kazuo Ueda; Hiroshige Takeichi; Kohei Wakamiya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.