Literature DB >> 25975360

Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.

Pamela Souza1, Kathryn Arehart2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Working memory refers to a cognitive system that manages information processing and temporary storage. Recent work has demonstrated that individual differences in working memory capacity measured using a reading span task are related to ability to recognize speech in noise. In this project, we investigated whether the specific implementation of the reading span task influenced the strength of the relationship between working memory capacity and speech recognition.
DESIGN: The relationship between speech recognition and working memory capacity was examined for two different working memory tests that varied in approach, using a within-subject design. Data consisted of audiometric results along with the two different working memory tests; one speech-in-noise test; and a reading comprehension test. STUDY SAMPLE: The test group included 94 older adults with varying hearing loss and 30 younger adults with normal hearing.
RESULTS: Listeners with poorer working memory capacity had more difficulty understanding speech in noise after accounting for age and degree of hearing loss. That relationship did not differ significantly between the two different implementations of reading span.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that different implementations of a verbal reading span task do not affect the strength of the relationship between working memory capacity and speech recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing; age; cognition; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25975360      PMCID: PMC4575618          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1043062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  33 in total

Review 1.  Mild cognitive impairment: disparity of incidence and prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Alex Ward; H Michael Arrighi; Shannon Michels; Jesse M Cedarbaum
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 21.566

2.  The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension.

Authors:  Gloria Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005 Apr-May

3.  Examining speech perception in noise and cognitive functions in the elderly.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Stefan Schreitmüller; Linda Grugel; Dirk Beutner; Martin Walger; Ingo Meister
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  P Shah; A Miyake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-03

5.  Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner; Michael Syskind Pedersen; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Gregory J Spillers; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory, Compressor Speed, and Background Noise Characteristics.

Authors:  Barbara Ohlenforst; Pamela E Souza; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Relating working memory to compression parameters in clinically fit hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Lynn Sirow
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Working-memory capacity and reading comprehension in young and older adults.

Authors:  M F Ehrlich; J Brébion; H Tardieu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

10.  Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.

Authors:  Jamie L Desjardins; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  19 in total

1.  Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory, Compressor Speed, and Background Noise Characteristics.

Authors:  Barbara Ohlenforst; Pamela E Souza; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Does Asymmetric Hearing Loss Affect the Ability to Understand in Noisy Environments?

Authors:  Rafael Barona; Juan Antonio Vizcaino; Claudio Krstulovic; Luz Barona; Carmen Comeche; Jose Montalt; Mercedes Ubeda; Carolina Polo
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Working Memory and Speech Recognition in Noise Under Ecologically Relevant Listening Conditions: Effects of Visual Cues and Noise Type Among Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Erin K Stewart; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Christopher Bishop; Ruth A Bentler; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Tim Schoof; Melinda Anderson; Dorina Strori; Lauren Balmert
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Verbal Working Memory in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Keri E Low; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Investigating the Role of Working Memory in Speech-in-noise Identification for Listeners with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 10.  Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.