Literature DB >> 23942882

Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique.

P P Koch1, D Müller, M Pisan, S F Fucentese.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) technology for the implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a rising interest in the orthopaedic community. Data of PSI are controversially discussed. The hypothesis of this paper is that the radiological accuracy of CT-based PSI is similar to the one of navigated TKA published in the literature.
METHODS: Since 2010, all 301 consecutively performed PSI TKAs (GMK MyKnee©) were included in this study. The radiological assessment consisted in a preoperative and postoperative standard X-ray and long-standing X-ray. Changes from the planned to the definitively implanted component size were documented. Postoperative analysis included limb alignment and position of femoral and tibial components (for varus/valgus and flexion or tibial slope).
RESULTS: The postoperative average hip-knee-ankle angle was 180.1° ± 2.0°. In the frontal plane a total of 12.4 % of outliers >3°, for the tibial components 4.1 % of outliers >3° and for the femoral components 4.8 % of outliers >3° were measured. A total of 12.3 % of outliers for posterior tibial slope and 9 % of outliers >3° for the femoral flexion were noted. 10.8 % of the 602 planned size components were adapted intraoperatively.
CONCLUSION: Although it is still unknown which limb axis is the correct one for the best clinical result, a technology providing the aimed axis in a most precise way should be chosen. Comparing the outcome of the current study with the data from the literature, there does not seem to be any difference compared to computer-assisted surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942882     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2625-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Precise landmarking in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty is critical to final alignment.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Isaac Livshetz; John Antoniou; Sari Greenberg-Dotan; David J Zukor
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler Steven Watters; Richard C Mather; James A Browne; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Song Zhao; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The results of TKA: what the registries don't tell us.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; J C Hermida; P C Chen; C W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John W Noble; Chris A Moore; Ning Liu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  29 in total

1.  Assessment of patient-specific instrumentation precision through bone resection measurements.

Authors:  F Zambianchi; A Colombelli; V Digennaro; A Marcovigi; R Mugnai; F Fiacchi; D Sandoni; A Belluati; F Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Morphological evaluation of the sagittal plane femoral load-bearing surface in computer-simulated virtual total knee arthroplasty implantation at different flexion angles.

Authors:  Shichang Chen; Yiming Zeng; Mengning Yan; Bing Yue; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Simon; Jimena Llorens de los Rios
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Individual valgus correction angle improves accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Hai Li; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Pengde Kang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Abnormal rate of intraoperative and postoperative implant positioning outliers using "MRI-based patient-specific" compared to "computer assisted" instrumentation in total knee replacement.

Authors:  M Ollivier; Q Tribot-Laspiere; J Amzallag; P Boisrenoult; N Pujol; P Beaufils
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comment on Conteduca et al.: patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Gregoire Laumond; Jérôme Murgier; Nicolas Reina; Jean Michel Laffosse; Emilie Bérard; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks.

Authors:  M L Dao Trong; C Diezi; G Goerres; N Helmy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Andrzej Kotela; Ireneusz Kotela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.