Literature DB >> 23937234

Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: effects of scene context and task instructions.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Khena M Swallow1, Liwei Sun1.   

Abstract

Visuospatial attention prioritizes regions of space for perceptual processing. Knowing how attended locations are represented is critical for understanding the architecture of attention. We examined the spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention and asked how it is influenced by explicit, top-down knowledge. Participants performed a visual search task in which a target was more likely to appear in one, "rich," quadrant of the screen than in the others. The spatial relationship between the display and the viewer's perspective changed partway through the experiment. Because incidentally learned attention is persistent, the spatial bias that developed during training was present following the change in viewer perspective. Despite the presence of multiple environmental landmarks including a background scene, participants prioritized rich regions relative to their perspective, rather than relative to the environment. Remarkably, the egocentric attentional bias was unaffected by explicit knowledge of where the target was likely to appear. Although participants used this knowledge to prioritize the region of space they were told was likely to contain a target, a strong egocentric bias to a region that was unlikely to contain a target persisted. These data indicate that incidental attention differs fundamentally from attention driven by explicit knowledge. We propose that attention takes 2 forms. One is declarative, based on maps that explicitly prioritize some regions of space over others. The other is procedural, influenced by implicit knowledge that modulates how attention is moved through space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23937234     DOI: 10.1037/a0033870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention.

Authors:  Emily L Twedell; Wilma Koutstaal; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

7.  Independence of implicitly guided attention from goal-driven oculomotor control.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Vanessa G Lee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Tamara Giménez-Fernández; David Luque; David R Shanks; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.