Literature DB >> 23925364

Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Daniel M Rasetshwane, Michael P Gorga, Stephen T Neely.   

Abstract

Because frequency components interact nonlinearly with each other inside the cochlea, the loudness growth of tones is relatively simple in comparison to the loudness growth of complex sounds. The term suppression refers to a reduction in the response growth of one tone in the presence of a second tone. Suppression is a salient feature of normal cochlear processing and contributes to psychophysical masking. Suppression is evident in many measurements of cochlear function in subjects with normal hearing, including distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Suppression is also evident, to a lesser extent, in subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. This paper describes a hearing-aid signal-processing strategy that aims to restore both loudness growth and two-tone suppression in hearing-impaired listeners. The prescription of gain for this strategy is based on measurements of loudness by a method known as categorical loudness scaling. The proposed signal-processing strategy reproduces measured DPOAE suppression tuning curves and generalizes to any number of frequency components. The restoration of both normal suppression and normal loudness has the potential to improve hearing-aid performance and user satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23925364      PMCID: PMC3909721          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2276351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  37 in total

1.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.

Authors:  D Byrne; H Dillon; T Ching; R Katsch; G Keidser
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Patricia A Dorn; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Transient emission suppression tuning curve attributes in relation to psychoacoustic threshold.

Authors:  Erika M Zettner; Richard C Folsom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Chin-Tuan Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  M B Sachs; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Properties of 'two-tone inhibition' in primary auditory neurones.

Authors:  R M Arthur; R R Pfeiffer; N Suga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea.

Authors:  W S Rhode; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression.

Authors:  H Duifhuis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Cori Birkholz; Alyson Gruhlke; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling.

Authors:  Thomas Brand; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Robin R High; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluation of Remote Categorical Loudness Scaling.

Authors:  Judy G Kopun; McKenna Turner; Sara E Harris; Aryn M Kamerer; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Nicole E Sieck; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Emily C Bosen; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.

Authors:  Alex G Armstrong; Chi Chung Lam; Shievanie Sabesan; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 29.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.