Literature DB >> 32873021

Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Erik J Jorgensen1, Ryan W McCreery2, Benjamin J Kirby3, Marc Brennan4.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of presentation level on spectral-ripple detection for listeners with and without sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Participants were 25 listeners with normal hearing and 25 listeners with SNHL. Spectral-ripple detection thresholds (SRDTs) were estimated at three spectral densities (0.5, 2, and 4 ripples per octave, RPO) and three to four sensation levels (SLs) (10, 20, 40, and, when possible, 60 dB SL). Each participant was also tested at 90 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Results indicate that level affected SRDTs. However, the effect of level depended on ripple density and hearing status. For all listeners and all RPO conditions, SRDTs improved from 10 to 40 dB SL. In the 2- and 4-RPO conditions, SRDTs became poorer from the 40 dB SL to the 90 dB SPL condition. The results suggest that audibility likely controls spectral-ripple detection at low SLs for all ripple densities, whereas spectral resolution likely controls spectral-ripple detection at high SLs and ripple densities. For optimal ripple detection across all listeners, clinicians and researchers should use a SL of 40 dB SL. To avoid absolute-level confounds, a presentation level of 80 dB SPL can also be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32873021      PMCID: PMC7443170          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  A comparison of threshold estimation methods in children 6-11 years of age.

Authors:  E Buss; J W Hall; J H Grose; M B Dev
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner; Amy Behrens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; Aniket A Saoji; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression.

Authors:  H Duifhuis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Essential Statistical Concepts for Research in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Grant D Brown; Ryan McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  1 in total

1.  Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.245

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.