Literature DB >> 23145614

Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Cori Birkholz1, Alyson Gruhlke, Stephen T Neely, Judy Kopun, Hongyang Tan, Walt Jesteadt, Kendra K Schmid, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Growth of distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression was measured in 65 subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss (HI). Measurements were made at four probe frequencies (f(2)) and up to five L(2) levels. Eleven suppressor frequencies (f(3)) were used for each f(2), L(2) combination. These data were compared to data from normal-hearing (NH) subjects (Gorga et al., 2011a). In both NH and HI subjects, growth of suppression depended on the relation between f(2) and f(3), such that the slope was close to one when f(3) ≈ f(2), steeper than one when f(3) < f(2), and shallower than one when f(3) > f(2). Differences in growth of suppression between NH and HI subjects were not observed for fixed f(2), L(2) combinations, however large differences were observed in suppressor "threshold" when compared at the same probe sensation level (dB SL). Smaller group differences were observed when compared at the same probe sound-pressure level (dB SPL). Therefore, the extent of these differences depended on how probe level (L(2)) was specified. When the results from NH and HI subjects are compared with each other and with psychophysical studies of masking, differences are observed that have implications for the remediation of mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145614      PMCID: PMC3505206          DOI: 10.1121/1.4754526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits.

Authors:  Christopher A Porter; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of aspirin on distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in human adults: a comparison with neonatal data.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.

Authors:  G K Martin; D Jassir; B B Stagner; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Wei-Li D Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

9.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission input/output characteristics in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Judy Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Nicole E Sieck; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.