Literature DB >> 7358916

Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression.

H Duifhuis.   

Abstract

Measurements of psychophysical two-tone suppression in a number of subjects are described. Levels of the stimulus components (suppressee, L1, and suppressor, L2) were the primary experimental variables. In all experiments the pulsation threshold was used with the probe frequency fr fixed at the suppressee frequency f1. In an initial experiment f1 was fixed at 1 kHz. The suppressor frequency f2 ranged from 0.2 to 1.4 kHz. At appropriate levels all subjects showed significant suppression. Suppression was found to decrease to zero as f2 approached f1. The amount of suppression depended on both L1 and L2 in a way not accounted for by any of the current theories of two-tone suppression. At higher overall levels suppression became increasingly prominent. The amount of two-tone suppression in a given stimulus condition depended strongly on the subject. The maximum amount of suppression measured was about 35 dB. In a second experiment it was verified that suppression follows the same pattern at other frequencies f1 (0.5, 2, and 4 kHz). Data for equal f2/f1 ratios were quite similar. The two-tone suppression effect decreased in a noisy environment. Within a 20-dB range of signal-to-noise ratios the effect of noise changed from negligible to the virtually complete elimination of two-tone suppression.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7358916     DOI: 10.1121/1.383971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  A psychoacoustic method to find the perceptual cues of stop consonants in natural speech.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

4.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erica L Hegland; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Global not local masker features govern the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Illusory auditory continuity despite neural evidence to the contrary.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Perceptual asymmetry induced by the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Dorea R Ruggles; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.