Literature DB >> 11831801

The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth.

Michael P Gorga1, Stephen T Neely, Patricia A Dorn, Dawn Konrad-Martin.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels in response to primary pairs (f2 = 2 or 4 kHz, L2 ranging from 20 to 60 dB SPL, L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB) were measured with and without suppressor tones (f3), which varied from 1 octave below to 1/2 octave above f2, in normal-hearing subjects. Suppressor level (L3) varied from -5 to 85 dB SPL. DPOAE levels were converted into decrements by subtracting the level in the presence of the suppressor from the level in the absence of a suppressor. DPOAE decrement vs L3 functions showed steeper slopes when f3 < f2 and shallower slopes when f3 > f2. This pattern is similar to other measurements of response growth, such as direct measures of basilar-membrane motion, single-unit rate-level functions, suppression of basilar-membrane motion, and discharge-rate suppression from lower animals. As L2 increased, the L3 necessary to maintain 3 dB of suppression increased at a rate of about 1 dB/dB when f3 was approximately equal to f2, but increased more slowly when f3 < f2. Functions relating L3 to L2 in order to maintain a constant 3-dB reduction in DPOAE level were compared for f3 < f2 and for f3 approximately = f2 in order to derive an estimate related to "cochlear-amplifier gain." These results were consistent with the view that "cochlear gain" is greater at lower input levels, decreasing as level increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11831801     DOI: 10.1121/1.1426372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Brenda M Hoover; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

5.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.