Literature DB >> 12703714

Transient emission suppression tuning curve attributes in relation to psychoacoustic threshold.

Erika M Zettner1, Richard C Folsom.   

Abstract

Ipsilateral suppression characteristics of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are described in relation to psychoacoustic threshold at 4000 Hz and the presence or absence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in 41 adults with normal hearing. TEOAE amplitudes were measured in response to 4000-Hz tonebursts presented in linear blocks at 40 and 50 dB SPL while puretone suppressors were introduced at a variety of frequencies and levels ipsilateral to and simultaneously with the tonebursts. Suppressors close to the toneburst frequency were most effective in decreasing the amplitude of the TEOAEs, while those more remote in frequency required significantly greater intensity for a similar amount of suppression. Consequently, characteristic tuning curve shapes were obtained. Tuning-curve tip levels were closely associated with the level of the toneburst and tip frequencies occurred at or above the toneburst frequency. Tuning-curve widths (Q10), however, varied significantly across subjects with similar psychoacoustic thresholds in quiet determined by a two-alternative forced-choice method. The results suggest that a portion of that variability may be explained by the presence or absence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in an individual ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12703714     DOI: 10.1121/1.1560191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

2.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

5.  Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Qin Gong; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Peripheral Auditory Involvement in Childhood Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Li Lin; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Hannah Stewart; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.