Literature DB >> 23920051

Measurement of characteristic prompt gamma rays emitted from oxygen and carbon in tissue-equivalent samples during proton beam irradiation.

Jerimy C Polf1, Rajesh Panthi, Dennis S Mackin, Matt McCleskey, Antti Saastamoinen, Brian T Roeder, Sam Beddar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to characterize how prompt gamma (PG) emission from tissue changes as a function of carbon and oxygen concentration, and to assess the feasibility of determining elemental concentration in tissues irradiated with proton beams. For this study, four tissue-equivalent water-sucrose samples with differing densities and concentrations of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen were irradiated with a 48 MeV proton pencil beam. The PG spectrum emitted from each sample was measured using a high-purity germanium detector, and the absolute detection efficiency of the detector, average beam current, and delivered dose distribution were also measured. Changes to the total PG emission from (12)C (4.44 MeV) and (16)O (6.13 MeV) per incident proton and per Gray of absorbed dose were characterized as a function of carbon and oxygen concentration in the sample. The intensity of the 4.44 MeV PG emission per incident proton was found to be nearly constant for all samples regardless of their carbon concentration. However, we found that the 6.13 MeV PG emission increased linearly with the total amount (in grams) of oxygen irradiated in the sample. From the measured PG data, we determined that 1.64 × 10(7) oxygen PGs were emitted per gram of oxygen irradiated per Gray of absorbed dose delivered with a 48 MeV proton beam. These results indicate that the 6.13 MeV PG emission from (16)O is proportional to the concentration of oxygen in tissue irradiated with proton beams, showing that it is possible to determine the concentration of oxygen within tissues irradiated with proton beams by measuring (16)O PG emission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23920051      PMCID: PMC3799908          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/5821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  An application of GafChromic MD-55 film for 67.5 MeV clinical proton beam dosimetry.

Authors:  I Daftari; C Castenadas; P L Petti; R P Singh; L J Verhey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Real-time monitoring of the Bragg-peak position in ion therapy by means of single photon detection.

Authors:  M Testa; M Bajard; M Chevallier; D Dauvergne; N Freud; P Henriquet; S Karkar; F Le Foulher; J M Létang; R Plescak; C Ray; M-H Richard; D Schardt; E Testa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Evaluation of Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters for passive dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams in radiotherapy.

Authors:  E G Yukihara; G Mardirossian; M Mirzasadeghi; S Guduru; S Ahmad
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Prompt gamma-ray emission from biological tissues during proton irradiation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J C Polf; S Peterson; G Ciangaru; M Gillin; S Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  LET dependence of GafChromic films and an ion chamber in low-energy proton dosimetry.

Authors:  Daniel Kirby; Stuart Green; Hugo Palmans; Richard Hugtenburg; Cecile Wojnecki; David Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  High-precision dosimetry for radiotherapy using the optically stimulated luminescence technique and thin Al2O3:C dosimeters.

Authors:  E G Yukihara; E M Yoshimura; T D Lindstrom; S Ahmad; K K Taylor; G Mardirossian
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and out-of-field cell survival responses to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning proton beam deliveries.

Authors:  Karl T Butterworth; Conor K McGarry; Ben Clasie; Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez; Jan Schuemann; Nicolas Depauw; Shikui Tang; Stephen J McMahon; Giuseppe Schettino; Joe M O'Sullivan; Hsaio-Ming Lu; Hanne Kooy; Harald Paganetti; Alan R Hounsell; Kathryn D Held; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Monte Carlo patient study on the comparison of prompt gamma and PET imaging for range verification in proton therapy.

Authors:  M Moteabbed; S España; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Correlation between internal fiducial tumor motion and external marker motion for liver tumors imaged with 4D-CT.

Authors:  A Sam Beddar; Kristofer Kainz; Tina Marie Briere; Yoshikazu Tsunashima; Tinsu Pan; Karl Prado; Radhe Mohan; Michael Gillin; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhang; Lei Dong; Andrew K Lee; James D Cox; Deborah A Kuban; Ron X Zhu; Xiaochun Wang; Yupeng Li; Wayne D Newhauser; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  10 in total

1.  Intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  H M Kooy; C Grassberger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification.

Authors:  E Draeger; D Mackin; S Peterson; H Chen; S Avery; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Detecting prompt gamma emission during proton therapy: the effects of detector size and distance from the patient.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Dennis Mackin; Eunsin Lee; Stephen Avery; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Secondary Particle Interactions in a Compton Camera Designed for in vivo Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Rajesh Panthi; Paul Maggi; Stephen Peterson; Dennis Mackin; Jerimy Polf; Sam Beddar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-12

Review 6.  Monitoring of Hadrontherapy Treatments by Means of Charged Particle Detection.

Authors:  Silvia Muraro; Giuseppe Battistoni; Francesco Collamati; Erika De Lucia; Riccardo Faccini; Fernando Ferroni; Salvatore Fiore; Paola Frallicciardi; Michela Marafini; Ilaria Mattei; Silvio Morganti; Riccardo Paramatti; Luca Piersanti; Davide Pinci; Antoni Rucinski; Andrea Russomando; Alessio Sarti; Adalberto Sciubba; Elena Solfaroli-Camillocci; Marco Toppi; Giacomo Traini; Cecilia Voena; Vincenzo Patera
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling.

Authors:  Aafke Christine Kraan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Compton Camera and Prompt Gamma Ray Timing: Two Methods for In Vivo Range Assessment in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Fernando Hueso-González; Fine Fiedler; Christian Golnik; Thomas Kormoll; Guntram Pausch; Johannes Petzoldt; Katja E Römer; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  PIBS: Proton and ion beam spectroscopy for in vivo measurements of oxygen, carbon, and calcium concentrations in the human body.

Authors:  Paulo Magalhaes Martins; Riccardo Dal Bello; Benjamin Ackermann; Stephan Brons; German Hermann; Thomas Kihm; Joao Seco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A New Method to Reconstruct in 3D the Emission Position of the Prompt Gamma Rays following Proton Beam Irradiation.

Authors:  Costanza M V Panaino; Ranald I Mackay; Karen J Kirkby; Michael J Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.