Literature DB >> 23022765

Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and out-of-field cell survival responses to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning proton beam deliveries.

Karl T Butterworth1, Conor K McGarry, Ben Clasie, Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez, Jan Schuemann, Nicolas Depauw, Shikui Tang, Stephen J McMahon, Giuseppe Schettino, Joe M O'Sullivan, Hsaio-Ming Lu, Hanne Kooy, Harald Paganetti, Alan R Hounsell, Kathryn D Held, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of passive scattered (PS) and pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton beam delivery techniques for uniform beam configurations was determined by clonogenic survival. The radiobiological impact of modulated beam configurations on cell survival occurring in- or out-of-field for both delivery techniques was determined with intercellular communication intact or physically inhibited. Cell survival responses were compared to those observed using a 6 MV photon beam produced with a linear accelerator. DU-145 cells showed no significant difference in survival response to proton beams delivered by PS and PBS or 6 MV photons taking into account a RBE of 1.1 for protons at the centre of the spread out Bragg peak. Significant out-of-field effects similar to those observed for 6 MV photons were observed for both PS and PBS proton deliveries with cell survival decreasing to 50-60% survival for scattered doses of 0.05 and 0.03 Gy for passive scattered and pencil beam scanned beams respectively. The observed out-of-field responses were shown to be dependent on intercellular communication between the in- and out-of-field cell populations. These data demonstrate, for the first time, a similar RBE between passive and actively scanned proton beams and confirm that out-of-field effects may be important determinants of cell survival following exposure to modulated photon and proton fields.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23022765     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/20/6671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of characteristic prompt gamma rays emitted from oxygen and carbon in tissue-equivalent samples during proton beam irradiation.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Rajesh Panthi; Dennis S Mackin; Matt McCleskey; Antti Saastamoinen; Brian T Roeder; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  High dose bystander effects in spatially fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi Asur; Karl T Butterworth; Jose A Penagaricano; Kevin M Prise; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Development of a portable hypoxia chamber for ultra-high dose rate laser-driven proton radiobiology applications.

Authors:  Pankaj Chaudhary; Deborah C Gwynne; Boris Odlozilik; Aaron McMurray; Giuliana Milluzzo; Carla Maiorino; Domenico Doria; Hamad Ahmed; Lorenzo Romagnani; Aaron Alejo; Hersimerjit Padda; James Green; David Carroll; Nicola Booth; Paul McKenna; Satyabrata Kar; Giada Petringa; Roberto Catalano; Francesco P Cammarata; Giuseppe A P Cirrone; Stephen J McMahon; Kevin M Prise; Marco Borghesi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.309

4.  Moving Forward in the Next Decade: Radiation Oncology Sciences for Patient-Centered Cancer Care.

Authors:  C Norman Coleman; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Pataje G S Prasanna; Jacek Capala; Ceferino Obcemea; Michael G Espey; Mansoor M Ahmed; Julie A Hong; Bhadrasain Vikram
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.