Literature DB >> 23909783

Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas.

Gabor Nemeth1, Ziad Hassan, Adrienne Csutak, Eszter Szalai, Andras Berta, Laszlo Modis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the repeatability of a new device measuring ocular biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness (CCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) and to investigate these parameters and their correlations in healthy eyes.
METHODS: Three consecutive measurements were performed on each eye using the CorVis ST device (Oculus Optikgeräte, Inc., Wetzler, Germany). Ten specific parameters, CCT, and IOP were measured. Biometric data were recorded with IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).
RESULTS: This study comprised 75 eyes of 75 healthy volunteers (mean age: 61.24 ± 15.72 years). Mean IOP was 15.02 ± 2.90 mm Hg and mean CCT was 556.33 ± 33.13 μm. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.865 for IOP and 0.970 for CCT, and coefficient of variation was 0.069 for IOP and 0.008 for CCT. ICC was 0.758 for maximum amplitude at highest concavity and 0.784 for first applanation time, and less than 0.6 for all other parameters. The device-specific data showed no significant relationship with age and axial length. Flattest and steepest keratometric values and IOP showed a significant correlation with the 10 device-specific parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The CorVis ST showed high repeatability for only IOP and pachymetric values. Single measurements are not reliable for the 10 device-specific parameters. The device allows for conducting clinical examinations and screening for surgeries altering ocular biomechanical properties with some form of averaging of multiple measurements. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23909783     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130719-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  45 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Jiaonan Ma; Yan Wang; Weiting Hao; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Lin Zheng; Ailing Bian; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Corneal biomechanical properties in 3 corneal transplantation techniques with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Naoyuki Maeda; Ryotaro Ueki; Mutsumi Fuchihata; Hisataka Fujimoto; Shizuka Koh; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.

Authors:  Iben Bach Pedersen; Sashia Bak-Nielsen; Anders Højslet Vestergaard; Anders Ivarsen; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Study of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with childhood glaucoma.

Authors:  Sara Garcia Caride; Lucia Perucho González; Federico Sáenz Francés; Julián García Feijoo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  Biomechanical Diagnostics of the Cornea.

Authors:  Vinicius S De Stefano; William J Dupps
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2017

7.  Comparison of corneal biomechanics in Sjögren's syndrome and non-Sjögren's syndrome dry eyes by Scheimpflug based device.

Authors:  Qin Long; Jing-Yi Wang; Dong Xu; Ying Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  A new method for detecting the outer corneal contour in images from an ultra-fast Scheimpflug camera.

Authors:  Magdalena Jędzierowska; Robert Koprowski; Sławomir Wilczyński; Katarzyna Krysik
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure and Other Biomechanical Parameters to Distinguish between Subclinical Keratoconus and Healthy Corneas.

Authors:  Cristina Peris-Martínez; María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; María Carmen García-Domene; María Dolores Pinazo-Durán; María José Luque-Cobija; María Ángeles Del Buey-Sayas; Susana Ortí-Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Effects of water drinking on corneal biomechanics: The association with intraocular pressure changes.

Authors:  Jesús Vera; Beatríz Redondo; Rubén Molina; Raimundo Jiménez
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.