Literature DB >> 25190024

Corneal biomechanical properties in 3 corneal transplantation techniques with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

Naoyuki Maeda1, Ryotaro Ueki, Mutsumi Fuchihata, Hisataka Fujimoto, Shizuka Koh, Kohji Nishida.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the corneal biomechanical properties of eyes that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
METHODS: This case-control study comprised 20 post-PK eyes, 14 post-DALK eyes, 15 post-DSAEK eyes, and 50 normal control eyes. A dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (the Corvis ST) was used to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties including deformation amplitude (DA) and radius at the highest concavity (R hc).
RESULTS: In post-PK eyes, the mean DA was 1.20 ± 0.13 mm, which was significantly higher than those of the control eyes (1.07 ± 0.09) and the post-DSAEK eyes (1.08 ± 0.12). The DA (1.18 ± 0.18) in the post-DALK eyes was significantly higher than in the control eyes. The R hc in the post-PK (6.34 ± 0.37 mm), -DALK (6.04 ± 1.22), and -DSAEK (6.44 ± 0.58) eyes was significantly smaller than in the control eyes (7.57 ± 0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer provides a method to obtain new biomechanical information on the cornea such as the DA and R hc, and these parameters differed among eyes that had undergone 3 different types of corneal surgery. Abnormalities in these parameters after the different corneal transplantation techniques may indicate larger deviations in the stress-strain reaction of the cornea and more uncertainty in the intraocular pressure measurements than in normal eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190024     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-014-0344-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  26 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Susan K Feigenbaum; Mujtaba A Qazi; Jeffrey P Sanderson; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas.

Authors:  Gabor Nemeth; Ziad Hassan; Adrienne Csutak; Eszter Szalai; Andras Berta; Laszlo Modis
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Intra- and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Paolo Vinciguerra; Elena Albè; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Silvia Trazza; Farhad Hafezi; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Michael Rudolph; Kathrin Laaser; Bjoern O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Daniel Epstein; Friedrich E Kruse
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Jafarinasab; Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Ali Hashemloo
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohammed Anwar; Klaus D Teichmann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.

Authors:  Bruno M Fontes; Renato Ambrósio; Daniela Jardim; Guillermo C Velarde; Walton Nosé
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Changes in corneal biomechanics following different keratoplasty techniques.

Authors:  Mohamed Hosny; Mohamed Abdel Moneim Hassaballa; Ahmed Shalaby
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of corneal biomechanics in patients with keratectasia following LASIK using dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Ryotaro Ueki; Naoyuki Maeda; Mutsumi Fuchihata; Tomoko Asai; Shizuka Koh; Hisataka Fujimoto; Masafumi Uematsu; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Ocular biomechanical measurements on post-keratoplasty corneas using a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device.

Authors:  Laszlo Modis; Ziad Hassan; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsanna Flaskó; Andras Berta; Gabor Nemeth
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Measurement repeatability of the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Atsuya Miki; Naoyuki Maeda; Tomoko Asai; Yasushi Ikuno; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Automatic method of analysis and measurement of additional parameters of corneal deformation in the Corvis tonometer.

Authors:  Robert Koprowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Open source software for the analysis of corneal deformation parameters on the images from the Corvis tonometer.

Authors:  Robert Koprowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Cataract surgery causes biomechanical alterations to the eye detectable by Corvis ST tonometry.

Authors:  Yoshitake Kato; Shunsuke Nakakura; Ryo Asaoka; Kanae Matsuya; Yuki Fujio; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Factors predicting change in corneal astigmatism following suture removal in post-penetrating keratoplasty patients.

Authors:  Vannarut Satitpitakul; Nopphawan Uramphorn; Ngamjit Kasetsuwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.