Literature DB >> 23907170

Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.

Diaa A Hameed1, Mohammed A Elgammal, Ehab O ElGanainy, Adel Hageb, Khaled Mohammed, Ahmed Mohamed El-Taher, Mostafa Mohamed Mostafa, Abdelfatah Ibrahim Ahmed.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the value of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in comparison to non contrast computed tomography (NCCT) density as possible predictors of upper urinary tract stone disintegration by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). This study included 100 consecutive patients, with solitary renal stone 0.5-2 cm or upper ureteral stone up to 1 cm. DXA to calculate stone mineral density (SMD) and stone mineral content (SMC) was done. NCCT was performed to measure Hounsfield units (HU). SWL was performed with an electromagnetic lithotripsy, plain X-ray documented disintegration after SWL. Successful treatment was defined as stone free or complete fragmentation after 1 or 2 sessions of SWL. The impact of patients age, sex, body mass index, stone laterality, location, volume, length, mean SMC and SMD, HU and Hounsfield density (HD), skin to stone distance (SSD) and number of shock waves were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Only 76 patients were available for follow-up. Success of disintegration was observed in 50 out of 76 patients (65.8 %). On multivariate analysis, SMC and number of shock wave were the significant independent factors affecting SWL outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.000, respectively). SMC as detected by DXA is a significant predictor of success of stone disintegration by SWL. SMC measured by DXA is more accurate than HU measured by CT. Patients with high stone mineral content (SMC greater than 0.65 g) should be directly offered another treatment option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907170     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  11 in total

1.  Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Noel A Armenakas; John A Fracchia
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Fred T Lee; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  CT and stone fragility.

Authors:  S P Dretler; B A Spencer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi.

Authors:  James C Williams; Samuel C Kim; Chad A Zarse; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic.

Authors:  L Dalla Palma; R Pozzi-Mucelli; F Stacul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  M R Mostafavi; R D Ernst; B Saltzman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.

Authors:  Narmada P Gupta; Mohd S Ansari; Pawan Kesarvani; Annu Kapoor; Seema Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Prediction of fragility of urinary calculi by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Anil Mandhani; Maniyur Raghavendran; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor; Uttam Singh; Anant Kumar; Mahendra Bhandari
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Calcium oxalate stone morphology: fine tuning our therapeutic distinctions.

Authors:  S P Dretler; G Polykoff
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis.

Authors:  G M Blake; I Fogelman
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.741

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones.

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Uğur Uyetürk
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

2.  Usability of shear wave elastography to predict the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Mehmet Demir; Osman Dere; İsmail Yağmur; Bülent Katı; Eyyup Sabri Pelit; İbrahim Halil Albayrak; Halil Çiftçi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Clinical Nomograms to Predict Stone-Free Rates after Shock-Wave Lithotripsy: Development and Internal-Validation.

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Seung Beom Ha; Chan Hoo Jeon; Jong Jin Oh; Sung Yong Cho; Seung-June Oh; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mohamed Gadelmoula; Ahmad A Elderwy; Islam F Abdelkawi; Ahmed M Moeen; Ghaleb Althamthami; Ahmed M Abdel-Moneim
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

5.  Analysis of the Application Value of X-Ray Digital Tomographic Fusion Technique in Urinary System Diseases.

Authors:  Chensi Ouyang; Xiufang Yang; Jinghong Xie; Jinqiang Hu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Is scoring system of computed tomography based metric parameters can accurately predicts shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rates and aid in the development of treatment strategies?

Authors:  Yasser Ali Badran; Alsayed Saad Abdelaziz; Mohamed Ahmed Shehab; Hazem Abdelsabour Dief Mohamed; Absel-Aziz Ali Emara; Ali Mohamed Ali Elnabtity; Maged Mohammed Ghanem; Hesham Abdel Azim ELHelaly
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Evaluating the importance of different computed tomography scan-based factors in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones.

Authors:  Muhammad Waqas; Imad-Ud-Din Saqib; Muhammad Imran Jamil; Mohammad Ayaz Khan; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-12-28

8.  Factors influencing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy efficiency for optimal patient selection.

Authors:  Marius Snicorius; Arnas Bakavicius; Albertas Cekauskas; Marius Miglinas; Gediminas Platkevicius; Arunas Zelvys
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.