Literature DB >> 15801357

Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi.

James C Williams1, Samuel C Kim, Chad A Zarse, James A McAteer, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

Helical CT has become the preferred method to diagnose urinary calculi in patients presenting with abdominal or flank pain. Recent in vitro studies have shown that CT also can display the internal structure in stones with remarkable detail. Because some stones respond better to SWL than others, knowing stone structure at diagnosis could be helpful in choosing among treatment options. This paper examines the potential for CT to be used in this way. Older CT technology proved to be problematic, in that all studies using low-resolution CT will suffer from an artifact in which stone size affects apparent CT attenuation values. Thus, the observation that stones with low measured CT attenuation break more easily than stones with high attenuation could be attributable entirely to an artifact of stone size. Most stones are composed of more than one mineral, and heterogeneity of composition may contribute to variability in stone response to SWL. Older technology is not useful in evaluating stone composition, but current and emerging CT machines have sufficient resolution to determine the composition and structure of stones inside the patient, provided proper viewing windows are used. Continuing improvement in image resolution in helical CT promises to provide information about stone composition and structure that will ultimately lead to better care for patients with stone disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15801357     DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Viewing windows do not alter Hounsfield units in CT scans.

Authors:  James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-11-22

3.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

4.  Kidney stones and imaging: what can your radiologist do for you?

Authors:  Raphaële Renard-Penna; Aurélie Martin; Pierre Conort; Pierre Mozer; Philippe Grenier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).

Authors:  James C Williams; Chad A Zarse; Molly E Jackson; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2007-04-05

Review 6.  [Diagnostic imaging of urolithiais. Current recommendations and new developments].

Authors:  M Thalgott; F Kurtz; J E Gschwend; M Straub
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Role of dual-source dual-energy computed tomography versus X-ray crystallography in prediction of the stone composition: a retrospective non-randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Murat Akand; Mustafa Koplay; Necat Islamoglu; Murat Gul; Ozcan Kilic; Merter Bora Erdogdu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Grant Chu; Andrew Sucov
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-20

10.  Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Andrew N Primak; Joel G Fletcher; Terri J Vrtiska; Oleksandr P Dzyubak; John C Lieske; Molly E Jackson; James C Williams; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.