Literature DB >> 15892818

Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.

Narmada P Gupta1, Mohd S Ansari, Pawan Kesarvani, Annu Kapoor, Seema Mukhopadhyay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of urinary calculi attenuation values from non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in predicting the outcome of treatment by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 112 patients with solitary renal and upper ureteric calculi of 0.5-2 cm undergoing ESWL. All patients had NCCT at 120 kV and 240 mA on a spiral CT scanner. During each ESWL session 3000 shock waves were given to a maximum of 3.0 kV. A final X-ray of the kidney, ureters and bladder was taken 12 weeks after the last ESWL session. Fragments of < or = 5 mm were regarded as clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF). The calculi retrieved were analysed by X-ray diffraction and the results assessed by comparing the mean density (as measured in Hounsfield units, HU) with the number of ESWL sessions and clearance.
RESULTS: In all, 82 (76%) patients had complete clearance of stones and 26 (24%) had CIRF. There was a linear relationship between the calculus density and number of ESWL sessions required. Of patients with calculi of < or = 750 HU, 41 (80%) needed three or fewer ESWL sessions and 45 (88%) had complete clearance. Of patients with calculi of > 750 HU, 41 (72%) required three or more ESWL sessions, and 37 (65%) had complete clearance. The best outcome was in patients with calculus diameters of < 1.1 cm and mean densities of < or = 750 HU; 34 (83%) needed three or fewer ESWL sessions, and the clearance rate was 90%. The worst outcome was in patients with calculus densities of > 750 HU and diameters of > 1.1 cm; 23 (77%) needed three or more ESWL sessions and the clearance rate was only 60%. The calculus density was a stronger predictor of outcome than size alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of NCCT for determining the attenuation values of urinary calculi before ESWL might help to predict the treatment outcome, and so might help in planning alternative treatment in patients with a likelihood of a poor outcome from ESWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15892818     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05520.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  55 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 5.  Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones.

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Uğur Uyetürk
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

6.  The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Alper Gok; Haci Polat; Ali Cift; Mehmet Ozgur Yucel; Bahri Gok; Mehmet Sirik; Can Benlioglu; Bedreddin Kalyenci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.

Authors:  Yusuke Sugino; Takahiro Kato; Shigeru Furuya; Takeshi Sasaki; Kiminobu Arima; Yoshiki Sugimura
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

9.  Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction.

Authors:  Uday Patel; Richard Miles Walkden; Khurshid R Ghani; Ken Anson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Are Hounsfield densities of ureteral stones a predictive factor for effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Basri Cakiroglu; S Erkan Eyyupoglu; Tuncay Tas; Mb Can Balci; Ismet Hazar; S Hilmi Aksoy; Orhun Sinanoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.