Literature DB >> 12686807

Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Gyan Pareek1, Noel A Armenakas, John A Fracchia.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies suggest that HU values on non-contrast computerized tomography may predict the ability to fragment urinary calculi. We determined whether the HUs of in vivo urinary stones could be used to predict the stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 50 patients who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for 5 to 10 mm. upper urinary tract stones. Chemical analyses and HU calculations were performed for each stone and posttreatment radiographic assessment categorized patients into a stone-free or a residual stone group. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test to compare mean HU values in the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Of the patients 32 (64%) were stone-free and 18 (36%) had residual stones. Mean values +/- SEM for the stone-free and residual stone groups were significantly different (551.20 +/- 46.66 versus 926.20 +/- 51.42 HU, p <0.0001). A total of 30 calculi (60%) were located in the ureter, including 21 in the stone-free group and 9 in the residual stone group with a mean value of 505.10 +/- 46.66 and 888.70 +/- 102.00 HU, respectively, which was significantly different (p = 0.0005). A total of 20 calculi (40%) were located in the kidney, including 11 in the stone-free group and 9 in the residual stone group with a mean value of 558.40 +/- 62.38 and 905.10 +/- 61.49 HU, respectively, which was significantly different (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that HU measurement of urinary calculi on pretreatment non-contrast computerized tomography may predict the stone-free rate. This information may be beneficial for selecting the preferred treatment option for patients with urinary calculi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12686807     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055608.92069.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  45 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Predicting the mineral composition of ureteral stone using non-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Manabu Kakizoe; Yoshitake Kato; Hitoshi Ishiguro; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  Reem Al-Bareeq; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Age-related delay in urinary stone clearance in elderly patients with solitary proximal ureteral calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osamu Ichiyanagi; Akira Nagaoka; Takuji Izumi; Yuko Kawamura; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Clinical factors prolonging the operative time of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones: a single-center analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Takashi Kawahara; Kazuhide Makiyama; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Can the Hounsfield unit predict the success of medically expulsive therapy?

Authors:  Sakip Erturhan; Omer Bayrak; Ahmet Mete; Ilker Seckiner; Gokhan Urgun; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction.

Authors:  Uday Patel; Richard Miles Walkden; Khurshid R Ghani; Ken Anson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.