Literature DB >> 33104861

Usability of shear wave elastography to predict the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: prospective pilot study.

Mehmet Demir1, Osman Dere2, İsmail Yağmur3, Bülent Katı3, Eyyup Sabri Pelit3, İbrahim Halil Albayrak3, Halil Çiftçi3.   

Abstract

The present study is intended to investigate the usability of shear wave elastography (SWE) in predicting the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) used in kidney stone treatment. ESWL was performed on a total number of 52 patients diagnosed with kidney stones between May 2019 and July 2020. The presence of a residual stone greater than 4 mm was accepted as failure. The patients were divided into two groups as ESWL success and ESWL failure. SWE and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements of stones were performed in all patients before ESWL. The two groups were compared in terms of age, gender, stone localisation, stone size, body mass index (BMI), skin-to-stone distance, HU, and SWE values of the stones. ESWL was successful in 30 of the 52 patients included in the study, while it failed in 22 of them. While the mean SWE value was 7.3 (7.9 ± 2.2) kPa in patients with success in ESWL, it was 14.6 (17.9 ± 10.2) kPa in those with failed ESWL. The mean HU was 883.5 (841.4 ± 191.1) in patients with success in ESWL and 1078 (1115.5 ± 183) in those with failed ESWL. Both SWE and HU values of the stones were found to be statistically significantly lower in the successful group (p < 0.05). It was seen that SWE and HU values were correlated to each other. The groups of successful and failed ESWL did not differ significantly in terms of age, gender distribution, stone size, BMI, and skin-to-stone distance (p > 0.05). With SWE, the hardness of the stone can be measured and its suitability for ESWL can be evaluated. It can be used as an alternative parameter to HU before ESWL treatment, since it has a lower cost compared to computed tomography (CT) and does not contain radiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy; Hounsfield unit; Kidney stone; Shear wave elastography

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33104861     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01221-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; James E Lingeman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-03

2.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Said Al-qahtani; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Hupertan; Pédro Fernandez; Jean-François Hermieu; Vincent Delmas; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Diaa A Hameed; Mohammed A Elgammal; Ehab O ElGanainy; Adel Hageb; Khaled Mohammed; Ahmed Mohamed El-Taher; Mostafa Mohamed Mostafa; Abdelfatah Ibrahim Ahmed
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Multidetector computed tomography: role in determination of urinary stones composition and disintegration with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ahmed el-Assmy; Mohamed E Abou-el-Ghar; Ahmed R el-Nahas; Huda F Refaie; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed E Abou-El-Ghar; Bassam A Awad; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Shear Wave Elastographic Alterations in the Kidney After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Rustu Turkay; Ercan Inci; Derya Bas; Arda Atar
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.