Literature DB >> 25374823

Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones.

Adnan Gücük1, Uğur Uyetürk1.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is widely used to examine stones in the urinary system. In addition to the size and location of the stone and the overall health of the kidney, CT can also assess the density of the stone in Hounsfield units (HU). The HU, or Hounsfield density, measured by CT, is related to the density of the tissue or stone. A number of studies have assessed the use of HU in urology. HUs have been used to predict the type and opacity of stones during diagnosis, and the efficacy has been assessed using methods including extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureterorenoscopic ureterolithotripsy (URSL), and medical expulsive treatment (MET). Previous studies have focused on the success rate of HU for predicting the type of stone and of ESWL treatment. Understanding the composition of the stone plays a key role in determining the most appropriate treatment modality. The most recent reports have suggested that the HU value and its variants facilitate prediction of stone composition. However, the inclusion of data regarding urine, such as pH and presence of crystals, increases the predictive accuracy. HUs, which now form part of the clinical guidelines, allow us to predict the success of ESWL; therefore, they should be taken into account when ESWL is considered as a treatment option. However, there are currently insufficient data available regarding the value of HU for assessing the efficacy of PCNL, URSL, and MET. Studies performed to date suggest that these values would make a significant contribution to the diagnosis and treatment of urinary system stones. However, more data are required to assess this further.

Keywords:  Hounsfield unit; Urinary stones

Year:  2014        PMID: 25374823      PMCID: PMC4220362          DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Nephrol        ISSN: 2220-6124


  22 in total

Review 1.  Management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; James E Lingeman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-03

2.  Computed tomography-based novel prediction model for the stone-free rate of ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jong Wook Kim; Ji Yun Chae; Jin Wook Kim; Mi Mi Oh; Hong Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Cheol Yong Yoon
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Said Al-qahtani; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Hupertan; Pédro Fernandez; Jean-François Hermieu; Vincent Delmas; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Does the Hounsfield unit value determined by computed tomography predict the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Uğur Uyetürk; Ufuk Oztürk; Eray Kemahli; Mevlüt Yildiz; Ahmet Metin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Diaa A Hameed; Mohammed A Elgammal; Ehab O ElGanainy; Adel Hageb; Khaled Mohammed; Ahmed Mohamed El-Taher; Mostafa Mohamed Mostafa; Abdelfatah Ibrahim Ahmed
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Prediction of stone composition from plain radiographs: a prospective study.

Authors:  S Ramakumar; D E Patterson; A J LeRoy; C E Bender; S B Erickson; D M Wilson; J W Segura
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Can the Hounsfield unit predict the success of medically expulsive therapy?

Authors:  Sakip Erturhan; Omer Bayrak; Ahmet Mete; Ilker Seckiner; Gokhan Urgun; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Eray Kemahlı; Uğur Üyetürk; Can Tuygun; Mevlüt Yıldız; Ahmet Metin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Using Hounsfield unit measurement and urine parameters to predict uric acid stones.

Authors:  Sara Spettel; Paras Shah; Kiran Sekhar; Allen Herr; Mark D White
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Hounsfield units on computed tomography predict calcium stone subtype composition.

Authors:  Sutchin R Patel; George Haleblian; August Zabbo; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  23 in total

1.  Toward a new insight of calcium oxalate stones in Drosophila by micro-computerized tomography.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chen; Huey-Yi Chen; Po-Chi Liao; Shih-Jing Wang; Ming-Yen Tsai; Yung-Hsiang Chen; Wei-Yong Lin
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The use of non-contrast computed tomography and color Doppler ultrasound in the characterization of urinary stones - preliminary results.

Authors:  Mesut Bulakçı; Tzevat Tefik; Fatih Akbulut; Mehmet Tolgahan Örmeci; Caner Beşe; Öner Şanlı; Tayfun Oktar; Artür Salmaslıoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

3.  Ureteral calculi lithotripsy for single ureteral calculi: can DNN-assisted model help preoperatively predict risk factors for sepsis?

Authors:  Mingzhen Chen; Jiannan Yang; Junlin Lu; Ziling Zhou; Kun Huang; Sihan Zhang; Guanjie Yuan; Qingpeng Zhang; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computerized tomography attenuation values can be used to differentiate hydronephrosis from pyonephrosis.

Authors:  Emrah Yuruk; Murat Tuken; Suhejb Sulejman; Aykut Colakerol; Ege Can Serefoglu; Kemal Sarica; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Effect of Stone Size and Composition on Ultrasonic Propulsion Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Michael R Bailey; Bryan W Cunitz; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Barbrina Dunmire
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis.

Authors:  Yasir Andrabi; Manuel Patino; Chandan J Das; Brian Eisner; Dushyant V Sahani; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

7.  Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Gholamreza Mokhtari; Atiyeh Amin; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Samaneh Esmaeili; Nadia Rastjou Herfeh; Reza Falahatkar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Effect of urine pH on the effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Ammar Al-Ani; Tawiz Gul; Hatem Kamkoum; Khalid Al-Jalham
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Jae Heon Kim; Dong Hyuk Kang; Doo Yong Chung; Dae Hun Lee; Hae Do Jung; Jong Kyou Kwon; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Shock Wave Lithotripsy is More Effective for Residual Fragments after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy than for Primary Stones of the Same Size: A Matched Pair Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Dariush Irani; Hossein Amirzargar
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2018-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.