Literature DB >> 11248917

CT and stone fragility.

S P Dretler1, B A Spencer.   

Abstract

Informed selection of treatment requires knowledge of the size and composition of a calculus. Spiral CT has a growing role in the detection of calculi, with an overall accuracy in excess of 95%. Moreover, the margin of error in determining stone size does not exceed 3.6%, and stone volume is underestimated by <5%. Pixelograms, the compilation of multiple points of attenuation, may provide clues to stone composition and durility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11248917     DOI: 10.1089/08927790150500926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  14 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy computed tomography applications in uroradiology.

Authors:  Jong Park; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Pelvi-calyceal height, a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A Symes; G Shaw; D Corry; S Choong
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-06-04

4.  Single session vs two sessions of flexible ureterosopy (FURS) for dusting of renal pelvic stones 2-3 cm in diameter: Does stone size or hardness play a role in number of sessions to be applied?"

Authors:  Ahmed Mamdouh Abd El Hamed; Hazem Elmoghazy; Mohamed Aldahshoury; Ahmed Riad; Mohammed Mostafa; Fawzy Farag; Wael Gamal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

5.  Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).

Authors:  James C Williams; Chad A Zarse; Molly E Jackson; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2007-04-05

6.  Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Diaa A Hameed; Mohammed A Elgammal; Ehab O ElGanainy; Adel Hageb; Khaled Mohammed; Ahmed Mohamed El-Taher; Mostafa Mohamed Mostafa; Abdelfatah Ibrahim Ahmed
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  The treatment of lower pole renal calculi in 2003.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  Abdominal fat distribution on computed tomography predicts ureteric calculus fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hsu-Cheng Juan; Hung-Yu Lin; Yii-Her Chou; Yi-Hsin Yang; Paul Ming-Chen Shih; Shu-Mien Chuang; Jung-Tsung Shen; Yung-Shun Juan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Variability of protein content in calcium oxalate monohydrate stones.

Authors:  James C Williams; Chad A Zarse; Molly E Jackson; Frank A Witzmann; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group.

Authors:  Hamdoune Abdelaziz; Yassine Elabiad; Ilyas Aderrouj; Abdellatif Janane; Mohamed Ghadouane; Ahmed Ameur; Mohamed Abbar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.