Literature DB >> 23868515

Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.

Dorothy A Sippo1, Graham I Warden, Katherine P Andriole, Ronilda Lacson, Ichiro Ikuta, Robyn L Birdwell, Ramin Khorasani.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm that determines American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) final assessment categories from radiology reports. This HIPAA-compliant study was granted institutional review board approval with waiver of informed consent. This cross-sectional study involved 1,165 breast imaging reports in the electronic medical record (EMR) from a tertiary care academic breast imaging center from 2009. Reports included screening mammography, diagnostic mammography, breast ultrasound, combined diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound, and breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. Over 220 reports were included from each study type. The recall (sensitivity) and precision (positive predictive value) of a NLP algorithm to collect BI-RADS final assessment categories stated in the report final text was evaluated against a manual human review standard reference. For all breast imaging reports, the NLP algorithm demonstrated a recall of 100.0 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 99.7, 100.0 %) and a precision of 96.6 % (95 % CI, 95.4, 97.5 %) for correct identification of BI-RADS final assessment categories. The NLP algorithm demonstrated high recall and precision for extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from the free text of breast imaging reports. NLP may provide an accurate, scalable data extraction mechanism from reports within EMRs to create databases to track breast imaging performance measures and facilitate optimal breast cancer population management strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868515      PMCID: PMC3782591          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9616-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Use of natural language processing to translate clinical information from a database of 889,921 chest radiographic reports.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; John H M Austin; Philip O Alderson; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class.

Authors:  Bethany Percha; Houssam Nassif; Jafi Lipson; Elizabeth Burnside; Daniel Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study.

Authors:  Keith J Dreyer; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Autumn M Hurier; Benjamin A Asfaw; Thomas Schultz; Elkan F Halpern; James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Evaluating healthcare quality using natural language processing.

Authors:  Karen Brandt Baldwin
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.095

6.  Rule-based information extraction from patients' clinical data.

Authors:  Agnieszka Mykowiecka; Małgorzata Marciniak; Anna Kupść
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Identification of findings suspicious for breast cancer based on natural language processing of mammogram reports.

Authors:  N L Jain; C Friedman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

8.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.

Authors:  R Ballard-Barbash; S H Taplin; B C Yankaskas; V L Ernster; R D Rosenberg; P A Carney; W E Barlow; B M Geller; K Kerlikowske; B K Edwards; C F Lynch; N Urban; C A Chrvala; C R Key; S P Poplack; J K Worden; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Discerning tumor status from unstructured MRI reports--completeness of information in existing reports and utility of automated natural language processing.

Authors:  Lionel T E Cheng; Jiaping Zheng; Guergana K Savova; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Facilitating cancer research using natural language processing of pathology reports.

Authors:  Hua Xu; Kristin Anderson; Victor R Grann; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004
View more
  15 in total

1.  Role of multi-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis of level 4 BI-RADS breast lesions and Logistic regression model.

Authors:  Xiaoling Leng; Guofu Huang; Lanhui Yao; Fucheng Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 2.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Automatic inference of BI-RADS final assessment categories from narrative mammography report findings.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Selen Bozkurt; Emel Alkim; Hersh Sagreiya; Allison W Kurian; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Tor D Tosteson; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Abby Kaye; Irina Gonzalez; Robyn Birdwell; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.

Authors:  Sergio M Castro; Eugene Tseytlin; Olga Medvedeva; Kevin Mitchell; Shyam Visweswaran; Tanja Bekhuis; Rebecca S Jacobson
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Thyroid Ultrasound Reports: Will the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System Improve Natural Language Processing Capture of Critical Thyroid Nodule Features?

Authors:  Kallie J Chen; Priya H Dedhia; Joseph R Imbus; David F Schneider
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Natural Language Processing for Automated Quantification of Brain Metastases Reported in Free-Text Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Joeky T Senders; Aditya V Karhade; David J Cote; Alireza Mehrtash; Nayan Lamba; Aislyn DiRisio; Ivo S Muskens; William B Gormley; Timothy R Smith; Marike L D Broekman; Omar Arnaout
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-04

8.  A Fusion NLP Model for the Inference of Standardized Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Scores from Radiology Report Text.

Authors:  Thiago Santos; Omar N Kallas; Janice Newsome; Daniel Rubin; Judy Wawira Gichoya; Imon Banerjee
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

9.  Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Francisco Gimenez; Elizabeth S Burnside; Kemal H Gulkesen; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 10.  Medical imaging and nuclear medicine: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; May Abdel-Wahab; Rifat Atun; Miriam Mikhail Lette; Diana Paez; James A Brink; Lluís Donoso-Bach; Guy Frija; Monika Hierath; Ola Holmberg; Pek-Lan Khong; Jason S Lewis; Geraldine McGinty; Wim J G Oyen; Lawrence N Shulman; Zachary J Ward; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.