Literature DB >> 30807833

Automatic inference of BI-RADS final assessment categories from narrative mammography report findings.

Imon Banerjee1, Selen Bozkurt2, Emel Alkim3, Hersh Sagreiya4, Allison W Kurian5, Daniel L Rubin6.   

Abstract

We propose an efficient natural language processing approach for inferring the BI-RADS final assessment categories by analyzing only the mammogram findings reported by the mammographer in narrative form. The proposed hybrid method integrates semantic term embedding with distributional semantics, producing a context-aware vector representation of unstructured mammography reports. A large corpus of unannotated mammography reports (300,000) was used to learn the context of the key-terms using a distributional semantics approach, and the trained model was applied to generate context-aware vector representations of the reports annotated with BI-RADS category (22,091). The vectorized reports were utilized to train a supervised classifier to derive the BI-RADS assessment class. Even though the majority of the proposed embedding pipeline is unsupervised, the classifier was able to recognize substantial semantic information for deriving the BI-RADS categorization not only on a holdout internal testset and also on an external validation set (1900 reports). Our proposed method outperforms a recently published domain-specific rule-based system and could be relevant for evaluating concordance between radiologists. With minimal requirement for task specific customization, the proposed method can be easily transferable to a different domain to support large scale text mining or derivation of patient phenotype.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS classification; Deep learning; Distributional semantics; Mammography report; NLP; Text mining

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30807833      PMCID: PMC6462247          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  23 in total

1.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Jennifer H Menell
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.

Authors:  Dorothy A Sippo; Graham I Warden; Katherine P Andriole; Ronilda Lacson; Ichiro Ikuta; Robyn L Birdwell; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.

Authors:  R Ballard-Barbash; S H Taplin; B C Yankaskas; V L Ernster; R D Rosenberg; P A Carney; W E Barlow; B M Geller; K Kerlikowske; B K Edwards; C F Lynch; N Urban; C A Chrvala; C R Key; S P Poplack; J K Worden; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Jafi A Lipson; Utku Senol; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Intelligent Word Embeddings of Free-Text Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Sriraman Madhavan; Roger Eric Goldman; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.

Authors:  Sergio M Castro; Eugene Tseytlin; Olga Medvedeva; Kevin Mitchell; Shyam Visweswaran; Tanja Bekhuis; Rebecca S Jacobson
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Automatic Classification of Ultrasound Screening Examinations of the Abdominal Aorta.

Authors:  Craig Morioka; Frank Meng; Ricky Taira; James Sayre; Peter Zimmerman; David Ishimitsu; Jimmy Huang; Luyao Shen; Suzie El-Saden
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Supervised machine learning and active learning in classification of radiology reports.

Authors:  Dung H M Nguyen; Jon D Patrick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Interobserver variability in upgraded and non-upgraded BI-RADS 3 lesions.

Authors:  A Y Michaels; C S W Chung; E P Frost; R L Birdwell; C S Giess
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Francisco Gimenez; Elizabeth S Burnside; Kemal H Gulkesen; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.317

View more
  4 in total

1.  Expanding the Secondary Use of Prostate Cancer Real World Data: Automated Classifiers for Clinical and Pathological Stage.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Christopher J Magnani; Martin G Seneviratne; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Authors:  Marzieh Esmaeili; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Azin Nahvijou; Keivan Maghooli
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings.

Authors:  Máté E Maros; Chang Gyu Cho; Andreas G Junge; Benedikt Kämpgen; Victor Saase; Fabian Siegel; Frederik Trinkmann; Thomas Ganslandt; Christoph Groden; Holger Wenz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.

Authors:  Arlene Casey; Emma Davidson; Michael Poon; Hang Dong; Daniel Duma; Andreas Grivas; Claire Grover; Víctor Suárez-Paniagua; Richard Tobin; William Whiteley; Honghan Wu; Beatrice Alex
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.