Literature DB >> 28428140

Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.

Sergio M Castro1, Eugene Tseytlin2, Olga Medvedeva3, Kevin Mitchell4, Shyam Visweswaran5, Tanja Bekhuis6, Rebecca S Jacobson7.   

Abstract

The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was developed to reduce variation in the descriptions of findings. Manual analysis of breast radiology report data is challenging but is necessary for clinical and healthcare quality assurance activities. The objective of this study is to develop a natural language processing (NLP) system for automated BI-RADS categories extraction from breast radiology reports. We evaluated an existing rule-based NLP algorithm, and then we developed and evaluated our own method using a supervised machine learning approach. We divided the BI-RADS category extraction task into two specific tasks: (1) annotation of all BI-RADS category values within a report, (2) classification of the laterality of each BI-RADS category value. We used one algorithm for task 1 and evaluated three algorithms for task 2. Across all evaluations and model training, we used a total of 2159 radiology reports from 18 hospitals, from 2003 to 2015. Performance with the existing rule-based algorithm was not satisfactory. Conditional random fields showed a high performance for task 1 with an F-1 measure of 0.95. Rules from partial decision trees (PART) algorithm showed the best performance across classes for task 2 with a weighted F-1 measure of 0.91 for BIRADS 0-6, and 0.93 for BIRADS 3-5. Classification performance by class showed that performance improved for all classes from Naïve Bayes to Support Vector Machine (SVM), and also from SVM to PART. Our system is able to annotate and classify all BI-RADS mentions present in a single radiology report and can serve as the foundation for future studies that will leverage automated BI-RADS annotation, to provide feedback to radiologists as part of a learning health system loop.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS); Imaging informatics; Information extraction; Machine learning; Natural language processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28428140      PMCID: PMC5706448          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  42 in total

1.  Coreference analysis in clinical notes: a multi-pass sieve with alternate anaphora resolution modules.

Authors:  Siddhartha Reddy Jonnalagadda; Dingcheng Li; Sunghwan Sohn; Stephen Tze-Inn Wu; Kavishwar Wagholikar; Manabu Torii; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Named entity recognition of follow-up and time information in 20,000 radiology reports.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Junichi Tsujii; Eric I-Chao Chang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Bayesian networks of BI-RADStrade mark descriptors for breast lesion classification.

Authors:  E A Fischer; J Y Lo; M K Markey
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Using machine learning for concept extraction on clinical documents from multiple data sources.

Authors:  Manabu Torii; Kavishwar Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A study of machine-learning-based approaches to extract clinical entities and their assertions from discharge summaries.

Authors:  Min Jiang; Yukun Chen; Mei Liu; S Trent Rosenbloom; Subramani Mani; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Identification of findings suspicious for breast cancer based on natural language processing of mammogram reports.

Authors:  N L Jain; C Friedman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

7.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  S G Orel; N Kay; C Reynolds; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside; Mehmet Ayvaci; Jude Shavlik; David Page
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min       Date:  2009

9.  Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System.

Authors:  Charles Friedman; Joshua Rubin; Jeffrey Brown; Melinda Buntin; Milton Corn; Lynn Etheredge; Carl Gunter; Mark Musen; Richard Platt; William Stead; Kevin Sullivan; Douglas Van Houweling
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Automatic Classification of Free-Text Radiology Reports to Identify Limb Fractures using Machine Learning and the SNOMED CT Ontology.

Authors:  Guido Zuccon; Amol S Wagholikar; Anthony N Nguyen; Luke Butt; Kevin Chu; Shane Martin; Jaimi Greenslade
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  18 in total

1.  Automatic inference of BI-RADS final assessment categories from narrative mammography report findings.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Selen Bozkurt; Emel Alkim; Hersh Sagreiya; Allison W Kurian; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Thyroid Ultrasound Reports: Will the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System Improve Natural Language Processing Capture of Critical Thyroid Nodule Features?

Authors:  Kallie J Chen; Priya H Dedhia; Joseph R Imbus; David F Schneider
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Generate Structured Radiology Report from CT Images Using Image Annotation Techniques: Preliminary Results with Liver CT.

Authors:  Samira Loveymi; Mir Hossein Dezfoulian; Muharram Mansoorizadeh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Natural Language Processing in Dutch Free Text Radiology Reports: Challenges in a Small Language Area Staging Pulmonary Oncology.

Authors:  J Martijn Nobel; Sander Puts; Frans C H Bakers; Simon G F Robben; André L A J Dekker
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Use of Natural Language Processing to Extract Clinical Cancer Phenotypes from Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Guergana K Savova; Ioana Danciu; Folami Alamudun; Timothy Miller; Chen Lin; Danielle S Bitterman; Georgia Tourassi; Jeremy L Warner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Natural Language Processing to Ascertain Cancer Outcomes From Medical Oncologist Notes.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Wenxin Xu; Eva Lepisto; Haitham Elmarakeby; Michael J Hassett; Eliezer M Van Allen; Bruce E Johnson; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-08

Review 7.  Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review.

Authors:  Sunyang Fu; David Chen; Huan He; Sijia Liu; Sungrim Moon; Kevin J Peterson; Feichen Shen; Liwei Wang; Yanshan Wang; Andrew Wen; Yiqing Zhao; Sunghwan Sohn; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 8.  Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.

Authors:  Zexian Zeng; Yu Deng; Xiaoyu Li; Tristan Naumann; Yuan Luo
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Authors:  Marzieh Esmaeili; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Azin Nahvijou; Keivan Maghooli
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Automated NLP Extraction of Clinical Rationale for Treatment Discontinuation in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Alkaitis; Monica N Agrawal; Gregory J Riely; Pedram Razavi; David Sontag
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.