Literature DB >> 12091676

Use of natural language processing to translate clinical information from a database of 889,921 chest radiographic reports.

George Hripcsak1, John H M Austin, Philip O Alderson, Carol Friedman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate translation of chest radiographic reports by using natural language processing and to compare the findings with those in the literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A natural language processor coded 10 years of narrative chest radiographic reports from an urban academic medical center. Coding for 150 reports was compared with manual coding. Frequencies and co-occurrences of 24 clinical conditions (diseases, abnormalities, and clinical states) were estimated. The ratio of right to left lung mass, association of pleural effusion with other conditions, and frequency of bullet and stab wounds were compared with independent observations. The sensitivity and specificity of the system's pneumothorax coding were compared with those of manual financial coding.
RESULTS: The system coded 889,921 reports on 251,186 patients. On the basis of manual coding of 150 reports, the processor's sensitivity (0.81) and specificity (0.99) were comparable to those previously reported for natural language processing and for expert coders. The frequencies of the selected conditions ranged from 0.22 for pleural effusion to 0.0004 for tension pneumothorax. The database confirmed earlier observations that lung cancer occurs in a 3:2 right-to-left ratio. The association of pleural effusion with other conditions mirrored that in the literature. Bullet and stab wounds decreased during 10 years at a rate consistent with crime statistics. A review of pneumothorax cases showed that the database (sensitivity, 1.00; specificity, 0.996) was more accurate than financial discharge coding (sensitivity, 0.17; P =.002; specificity, 0.996; not significant).
CONCLUSION: Internal and external validation in this study confirmed the accuracy of natural language processing for translating chest radiographic narrative reports into a large database of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091676     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  76 in total

1.  Detecting adverse drug events in discharge summaries using variations on the simple Bayes model.

Authors:  Shyam Visweswaran; Paul Hanbury; Melissa Saul; Gregory F Cooper
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

2.  Automated extraction and normalization of findings from cancer-related free-text radiology reports.

Authors:  Burke W Mamlin; Daniel T Heinze; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  A pilot study of contextual UMLS indexing to improve the precision of concept-based representation in XML-structured clinical radiology reports.

Authors:  Yang Huang; Henry J Lowe; William R Hersh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Automated detection of critical results in radiology reports.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Woojin Kim; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Automated identification of extreme-risk events in clinical incident reports.

Authors:  Mei-Sing Ong; Farah Magrabi; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Critical finding capture in the impression section of radiology reports.

Authors:  Esteban F Gershanik; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

7.  Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Martin L Gunn; Fei Xia; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

8.  Named entity recognition of follow-up and time information in 20,000 radiology reports.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Junichi Tsujii; Eric I-Chao Chang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Repurposing the clinical record: can an existing natural language processing system de-identify clinical notes?

Authors:  Frances P Morrison; Li Li; Albert M Lai; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.