Literature DB >> 15591435

Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study.

Keith J Dreyer1, Mannudeep K Kalra, Michael M Maher, Autumn M Hurier, Benjamin A Asfaw, Thomas Schultz, Elkan F Halpern, James H Thrall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate the accuracy of Lexicon Mediated Entropy Reduction (LEXIMER), a new information theory-based computer algorithm developed by the authors for independent analysis and classification of unstructured radiology reports based on the presence of clinically important findings (F(T), where (T) represents "true") and recommendations for subsequent action (R(T)).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the Human Research Committee of the institutional review board. Consecutive de-identified radiology reports (n = 1059) comprising results of barium studies (n = 99), computed tomography (n = 107), mammography (n = 90), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 108), nuclear medicine (n = 99), positron emission tomography (n = 106), radiography (n = 212), ultrasonography (n = 131), and vascular procedures (n = 107) were independently analyzed by two radiologists and then with LEXIMER to categorize the reports into F(T) and F(T)0 (containing or not containing clinically important findings) categories and R(T) and R(T)0 (containing or not containing recommendations for subsequent action) categories. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of LEXIMER for placing reports into F(T) and F(T)0 and R(T) and R(T)0 categories were assessed by using appropriate statistical tests.
RESULTS: There was strong interobserver concordance between the two radiologists for placing radiology reports into F(T) and R(T) categories (kappa = 0.9, P < .01). For the LEXIMER program, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, were 97.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.6%, 98.5%), 98.9% (95% CI: 97.9%, 99.6%), 94.9% (95% CI: 93.1%, 96.0%), 97.5% (95% CI: 96.6%, 98.0%), and 97.7% (95% CI: 95.8%, 98.8%) for placing radiology reports into F(T) and F(T)0 categories and 99.6% (95% CI: 99.2%, 99.9%), 98.2% (95% CI: 95.0%, 99.6%), 99.9% (95% CI: 99.4%, 99.99%), 99.4% (95% CI: 96.3%, 99.9%), and 99.7% (95% CI: 98.9%, 99.9%) for placing reports into R(T) and R(T)0 categories.
CONCLUSION: LEXIMER is an accurate automated engine for evaluating the percentage positivity of clinically important findings and rates of recommendation for subsequent action in unstructured radiology reports. (c) RSNA, 2004.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15591435     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2341040049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  49 in total

1.  Automated detection of critical results in radiology reports.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Woojin Kim; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Martin L Gunn; Fei Xia; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Information from Searching Content with an Ontology-Utilizing Toolkit (iSCOUT).

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Evaluation of a generalizable approach to clinical information retrieval using the automated retrieval console (ARC).

Authors:  Leonard W D'Avolio; Thien M Nguyen; Wildon R Farwell; Yongming Chen; Felicia Fitzmeyer; Owen M Harris; Louis D Fiore
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Natural Language Processing Techniques for Extracting and Categorizing Finding Measurements in Narrative Radiology Reports.

Authors:  M Sevenster; J Buurman; P Liu; J F Peters; P J Chang
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Unsupervised Topic Modeling in a Large Free Text Radiology Report Repository.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Imaging informatics: essential tools for the delivery of imaging services.

Authors:  David S Mendelson; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Identifying wrist fracture patients with high accuracy by automatic categorization of X-ray reports.

Authors:  Berry de Bruijn; Ann Cranney; Siobhan O'Donnell; Joel D Martin; Alan J Forster
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  The Clinical Outcomes Assessment Toolkit: a framework to support automated clinical records-based outcomes assessment and performance measurement research.

Authors:  Leonard W D'Avolio; Alex A T Bui
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.